This video is available on Rumble, Bitchute, Odysee, Telegram, and X.
Last week, Heather Mac Donald, who is one of the best people in mainstream media, wrote this: “Trump Takes His Biggest Step Yet Toward Restoring Meritocracy.”
He had just signed this executive order, which bans a pernicious legal doctrine called “disparate impact.”
This terrible, anti-white practice goes all the way back to 1971, since before a lot of you were born. Here’s how it started.
In the 1950s, before anti-discrimination laws, the North Carolina-based Duke Power Company hired blacks only for low-level jobs.
For better jobs, it weeded out less promising whites by requiring a high school diploma and good scores on the Wonderlic IQ test and a mechanical aptitude test.
After the Civil Rights Act of 1964 banned race discrimination, Duke Power opened all job categories to blacks.
Its diploma and test requirements kept out more blacks than whites. Thirty-four percent of whites had a high school diploma but only 12 percent of blacks did.
The tests weeded out 42 percent of white applicants, but 94 percent of blacks. Nobody could argue that these requirements were set up to keep out blacks. Duke Power had used them to pick the best white candidates, and when the law changed, anyone could apply.
However, since blacks had a harder time meeting the grade, the requirements were said to have a “disparate impact” on them. Yes, they hit blacks harder. The ’64 Civil Rights act had banned intentional race discrimination, but the Supreme Court — just five years later in a case called Griggs v Duke Power — said that racially neutral standards with a desperate impact can also be racist and just as illegal as deliberate, outright race discrimination—even if there was no intent to discriminate at all.
Obviously, there have to be hiring standards. If you want to be a lifeguard, you have to know how to swim. That has a disparate impact on blacks because fewer blacks than whites can swim.
So, the court permitted disparate impact for standards that are a business necessity: something someone absolutely must know how to do to do the job. The court said a high-school education and good test scores weren’t a business necessity for Duke Power.
What is a “business necessity?” That question has kept lawyers fat for more than half a century. But it’s illegal to hire only the best. You might want your management trainees to have IQs of at least 125. That would have a drastic disparate impact on blacks because they are only one thirtieth as likely as whites to score that high.
The fact is, brains matter for any job. Smart waiters and warehouse clerks generally do a better job than dim ones, but IQ tests have a disparate impact, and good luck explaining to a judge why you want smart people in your warehouse.
It’s remarkable that as far back as 1971, the Warren Burger court — eight white men and one black — decided without dissent to enshrine something as crazy as disparate impact.
People think this anti-white foolishness — CRT, DEI, white privilege, systemic racism — is more recent. Those dead white males did it to us first. There’s even a roadside marker celebrating their prohibition of “discriminatory practices.”
Women can claim disparate impact. Alabama required prison guards be at least 5-feet 2-inches tall and weigh at least 120 pounds. That kept out more women than men, and a court ruled that size wasn’t a “business necessity” for prison guards. I think a guard should have an imposing presence, but I guess the court thought you could be a dwarf and be a prison guard.
Abercrombie & Fitch had to pay $40 million to non-whites because it wanted clerks in its stores to have the “Abercrombie look:” attractive, classic hair styles, no tats or facial hair, no head coverings, and a slim body that showed off Abercrombie clothes to good effect.
It wasn’t a whites-only policy and there were some non-white clerks, but “the look” had a disparate impact. Now, of course, we have court-ordered “diversity” — and your clothes cost more to cover that $40 million.
“Disparate impact” can be used to overturn zoning that bans apartment buildings. If your town doesn’t want apartments because they attract low-lifes, too bad. Low-lifes are more likely to be BIPOCs, so the Feds can force you to zone for apartments.
California came close to requiring judges to give non-whites lighter criminal sentences. In 2023, Assemblyman Reggie Jones-Sawyer introduced AB 852, which said: “Whenever the court has discretion” in criminal sentencing, it “shall consider the disparate impact on historically disenfranchised and system-impacted populations.”
Laws against murder and robbery have a disparate impact on blacks and Hispanics, alright, so judges would have to ease up on sentences. Believe it or not, this awful bill passed, 58-13, in the California lower house, but died in the senate.
The same thinking was behind this headline from three years ago: “Washington schools adopt race-based discipline, white students to get harsher punishment.”
The Clover Park district — 72 percent non-white — was punishing non-whites more often than it punished whites.
“Culturally responsive discipline” was the solution. In other words, slam the white kids harder.
Fortunately, Mr. Trump just signed another executive order: “Reinstating Commonsense School Discipline Policies,” which requires race-blind punishment based on bad behavior and nothing else.
Reinstating common sense. It’s about time.
Everything I have been talking about, and plenty more, comes from ignoring not just common sense but hard science. People of different races don’t have the same average abilities. This graph reflects one of the oldest, best-established findings in psychological testing.
The red bars are black distributions in IQ, and the blue bars are whites. The black average is 85 and the white average is 100. Everything to the right of 100 means above-average. Look at how whites dominate in that space. And these are distributions. The actual number of high-IQ blacks will be a fraction of that because there are more whites than blacks.
Talking about this is taboo. There has never been a “disparate impact” court case in which the defendants explained, “Your honor, there is a disparate impact because groups aren’t the same. There’s no racism here. We are scrupulously fair in applying our standards to all candidates.” No one dares say that.
This pernicious race/IQ taboo has got to be smashed. The executive order banning disparate impact thinking is an important step. But please, Mr. Trump, appoint a blue-ribbon panel to study the facts about race differences, and present the findings with as much fanfare and press coverage as possible.
It would create a huge stink, but huge stinks are your specialty. The country must tear off its blinders and grapple with a problem that has been tormenting us for decades.
Got into it with a moron elder who said that they, as in the morons, “don’t believe in IQ”. Don’t know if it’s just him or all of them, but it seems we can’t all be “created equal” if science and technology and facts keep getting in the way.
This is, and always has been, a huge problem.
It will take considerably more than a “blue ribbon panel”. The implications, internationally, and into the future are myriad. It has not been decades, but centuries, and the “torment” does stink, constantly and continuously. It is rot, not progress. And I agree that it, this “taboo”, if that’s what you prefer to call it, must be smashed. Easier said than done however, as everywhere,” error holds the sway”. How dare you get smart, it ruins the established realities. Prey$ B
Disparate impact is a profoundly un-American doctrine. It’s basically telling people, no we won’t tell you what’s a legitimate business need in advance, you have to get sued and find out. Quotas are officially illegal, but an 80% one is built into the disparate impact doctrine. Thankfully Trump has revoked it, although I imagine the courts will resist it any way they can.
No doctrine that ordinary people are expected to interact with or obey should be in any way opaque to an autistic homeschooled 6th grader.
A significant percentage of whites also oppose meritocracy.
An example of this is opposition among some middle-class and upper-class whites to the use of merit-based aptitude test results in college admissions, especially at elite universities.
These white parents of graduating high-school seniors fear reduced opportunities for their children as a result of competition from more academically talented Asian-Americans, an increasingly large demographic.
This rarely admitted fear may partially explain the bipartisan nature of America’s increasing hostility towards China.
But here’s the irony: Surely a renewed overall emphasis on meritocracy is being driven by the fact that China’s rise is so impressive that America can no longer afford the self-mutilating indulgence of nonsense like affirmative action and DIE insanity.
In a country that is now borderline White minority population, the chances of returning to any form of meritocracy are not that good but even if we could, many poor performing non-Whites would still wind up with jobs they can’t perform because the new demographics won’t provide enough intelligent people. DEI of some form is now baked into the cake.
Also, if meritocracy really comes back and we wind up with 99% of the high level jobs and professional positions being White and Asian with almost zero blacks, guess what will happen? We will revert back to some form of affirmative action because no one will admit the reality of race and it will be assumed the disparity must be due to racism.
The Creator kept us apart for a good reason. “Diversity” has been used to ruin white nations because white nations are the key impediment to global control. Besides white nations, who else would prevent a one world government? Cambodia? Zimbabwe? Honduras? White nations have the talent and IQ to be self sufficient in industry, food production, armaments, etc. If you want to take over the world, the first thing you have to do is get rid of white nations. Of course China is an exception, otherwise most nations comprising people of color are no threat to the NWO, as long as they can eat and fuck they won’t complain, and the ptb know it. The saddest part is that this damage is happening with the full participation of the white political class. What we once called traitors are now seen as “elites”. Fuck diversity, and if you don’t like what I’m saying, fuck you too.
Jared Taylor will not name the elephant in the room…
It’s the JEW$…it’s ALWAYS the JEW$…
Of course not, he’s organized opposition. He’s the son of Zionist Protestant missionaries from the South.
Well if these talented Asians are so awesome let them go back to Asia and prove it. Why, Why do they need to be educated in our Western culture where by the way up until say the 20th century they never were? That includes the jews and negros. How many were educated in say the Italian universities in the 1200’s or Oxford, or Cambridge in the 1600, 1700, or 1800 hundreds or beyond? You want to answer that too use three examples? There are many more I could use. The Asiatics by the way had nothing to do with creating the Renaissance or the scientific, technological, or industrial revolutions when now jew, asians, or negros even knew what what these developments were. Everything they have since the modern world was created by the Renaissance was done by Western men. Try and prove me wrong. I dare you. As far as the negros without living with us or we interacting with them they are nothing, they would still be living the same way as 400 years ago when our European forefathers took over their continent.
‘Gee Wally, how did we get all these vicious anti-99%’er white laws?’
Someone should strap a megaphone to Jared Taylor’s ear and scream……….
‘It’s the 1% goy and jew white Elite you yellow journalist bastard you!’
A long ago disappeared article in Foreign Affairs gloated over Israel’s negotiating with China behind the United States’ back for years and without the latter having a clue, as the authors put it. How very funny. The article vaguely implies that Israel had been negotiating a dual Sino-Israeli global hegemony, with Israel using technology (ie, the fruits of espionage against the US) as bargaining chips with the Chinese whose own technology (ie, the fruits of espionage against the US) hadn’t gotten it all. The article ends in a mocking tone by citing Palmerston’s quip that nations don’t have permanent allies, only permanent interests, which permanent interests in the case of Israel, as the authors assert, entail throwing the US under the bus and replacing it with China.
Commenters here have pointed out that if that were the case, then the Israeli dual citizens who run the United States government and their flunkies, including all but maybe five members of Congress, would not be simultaneously confronting China over Taiwan. On the other hand, if this bipolar hegemony were to take place, it would require the annihilation of the United States, Europe, and Russia, with only the differing circumstances limiting the mode of warfare being conducted at this time. And yet, whatever the merits of the case made in Foreign Affairs or by critics of the article, the facts on the ground unarguably make it clear that some highly organized entity is engaged in a simultaneous war of annihilation against the United States, Europe, and Russia and needs to be identified before it’s too late.
Brown vs Board of Education was equally insane…Apparently whites and jews, in the US at least, have a compulsion to give blacks things that they don’t even want, like Brown…Black schools had strong discipline and scored well on tests…White schools with blacks don’t, and the result is chaos….
In Gilbert Islands’ folk lore, there were islands that had only white people, and islands that had only black people. Everyone lived in peace. Then one day, the white and black populations mixed. Then there was endless war.
We know Jo\e Biden was thieving govt documents and selling them to overseas buyers for five decades, China is the most logical buyer. going by the Biden crime families connection to Paradigm Global Advisors the Chinese money laundering hedge fund.
Uh, JT, white people were guilt-tripped into passing these laws of which you write….
Liberalism is a cover for the naked self interest of the jews.
The US is suffering from a spiritual sickness and has moved away from its Christian roots of Love Thy Neighbor to a Satanic/Jewish worldview of Hate Thy Neighbor.
http://biblicisminstitute.wordpress.com/2014/07/17/is-america-cursed/
http://biblicisminstitute.wordpress.com/2015/04/28/the-war-on-christianity/
There’s a dire need for an adjustment.
http://biblicisminstitute.wordpress.com/2015/04/16/the-heart-adjustment/
Viewing the current situation from a racial or gender perspective is both incorrect and misleading. The game is about elite control over the 99%—the “sheeple.” White, Black, man, woman—none of that matters. A financial elite class—as has happened throughout history multiple times—must maintain its grip on power at the expense of the majority, and it doesn’t matter where they come from or who they are.
Intelligence is not a ‘thing’ that can be measured. Intelligence is a perception.
Intelligence is not a perception that can be measured, like hearing or vision.
Intelligence is a perception of the relationship between your conditioning and your perception; your memory and your emotions.
That is to say, intelligence is the constant insight into the relationship between memory and perception, and memory and emotion.
Thus, intelligence cannot be measured. Intelligence is by definition subtle (look at the etymology to get a hint).
Maybe what is being measured is indeed important and has a predictive quality, but it’s not intelligence.
Second point: articles like the above, and like Jung-Freud’s article yesterday, which cannot even mention the concept of class, lower the general political acuity of a population, including the UNZ reader population. It’s not that class is all important, but class analysis is a key tool for understanding social and political realities. A class analysis would certainly help clarify why the Jewish/White elite alliance successfully and steadily increases their political and economic power.
The absence of a class analysis indicates a juvenile map of reality.
Speaking of disparate impact:
https://www.takimag.com/article/right-on-queue/
This isn’t for the benefit of Whites, it’s just more preparation for the millions upon millions of Indians they want to bring in. You know, the ones with higher IQs than blacks and hispanics who will do the upper middle class jobs for half as much as White Americans.
How did we get these vicious laws? We got them the same way we get all laws — through elected representatives; through voting. It’s also notable that until Trump’s sudden push for meritocracy, considerable cultural inertia was allowed to accumulate behind them. White men who disliked being discriminated against nevertheless quietly tolerated those laws, and a considerable number of whites even celebrated them. This was, perhaps, particularly true of women, especially white women, who were among the greatest beneficiaries.
I think we can’t understand the reason these laws passed and have been accepted by whites with such equanimity without considering something that this article doesn’t even mention, but which surfaced explicitly in the 1978 Bakke decision — the notion of a “compelling state interest”.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compelling_state_interest#United_States
As Justice Powell wrote in Bakke, the state has a compelling interest in ensuring diversity. It used this interest to justify restricting the freedom of whites. It openly discriminates against them and mandates it as the law of the land, public policy. It feels itself right to do so in the interest of securing good relations between all of its citizens, whatever their race or sex, and ensuring maximum utilization of their potential as human capital. Thus, the facts that Jared Taylor points to in this article, while true, are beside the point. Disparate impact has shown itself to be the flimsiest of pretexts for discriminating against white men in furtherance of this supposed state interest, yet whites, owing to their long history of subscribing to ideals of racial and sexual equality, which are ultimately rooted in their Christian cultural legacy, didn’t feel they could reasonably object. Had they rioted, burned things down, planted a few well-placed bombs, or made a few targeted assassinations, things might well have turned out quite differently. Their lack of action implies agreement.
Was it all a mistake? Would it have been better to let racial animosity build until the until the country burned? Arguably so, although I think the people would have shrunk back from that. Other courses of action are always possible. Which path to choose is a dispute for the technicians of state; politicians and bureaucrats. But I doubt that in the long run Trump’s abrupt turn around will amount to much. It’s certainly not going to take women out of the workplace and put them back in the home. Other excuses will no doubt be made to keep most of the niggers in their affirmative action jobs. The executive orders Trump has signed can easily be undone by the next Washington regime, and probably will be. Besides, just look at his appointments. He’s very fond of appointing women. He’s got Tulsi Gabbard, a mixed race woman as head of DNI, a mestizo as his labor secretary, and made a pajeet head of the FBI. Are we supposed to believe that these choices actually show a commitment to meritocracy? That no better qualified white men exist? Trump’s not going to restore anything to the way it was in the good old days. He’s just a showman, a politician surfing the cultural waves of multi-racialism and sexual equality. For now, it’s what the people want.
It is because we have not collectively stood up for candid mother’s like Shiloh Hendrix. It took Joan of Arc to get the French to rid themselves of foreigners.
Perhaps Shiloh will do well enough in the US regards to blacks.
Trump does these good things but then does stupid things like making enemies of people who we’ve had good relations with for over 200 years or supporting the most despised group in the world.
I imagine it started around the time the Romans allowed foreign preachers the power to control their culture. Am I warm?
PhD David Skbrina is 100 % right when it comes to the mirage of liberalism.
https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2025/05/01/an-open-letter-to-liberals/
¶ 1 is absolutely false. Intelligence is indeed a “thing”, in the same sense that the proletariat is a “thing”, that poverty is a “thing”, and that injustice is a “thing”. It is not a “thing” in quite the same sense that the android cellphone now in my left hand is a “thing”.
Intelligence is not a “perception”. It is the way we organize our perceptions into a meaningful whole. E.g.: You are in your living room reading Herbert Marcuse. You hear six bangs in rapid succession (your intelligence interprets them as “gunshots”). You hear other sounds that your intelligence interprets as “breaking glass”. You hear another sound that you interpret as “a police siren”. The page of your Herbert Marcuse book intermittently flashes red, which your intelligence interprets as light from a police car. Your intelligence may tell you: “There’s trouble in the alley outside.”
Suppose that I’m math teacher to young Gauss. Suppose that I assign the class the problem of adding all the integers from 1 to 100. (1+2+3+4+5+6…). Suppose that I assume that I’ll have a few minutes to read my Hegel book, which is why I gave this problem to the class. Suppose that, a few seconds later, young Gauss walks to my desk and bangs his (correct) answer on it, saying “Hier leg’st!”
I say that that incident is 👉 proof 👈 that young Gauss has a “thing” called “intelligence”, which not a “perception” but a faculty of mind.
Please consider this matter carefully. If you have as much 🌿 intelligence 🌿 as young Gauss, you will grasp the matter at once.
Please read my devastating riposte. It will give your intellect something nutritious to chew on.
It wasn’t blacks who pushed the nonsense into law and policy, it was leftist women, the MOTHERS of the Boomers. Along with help from their pussy-worshipping, power-hungry sycophant simps, of course.
The white/jewish alliance is a natural one. It was held back by misguided perceptions on both parties (jews’ fear of Nazis on one side, and whites’ fear of Commies on the other).
More on this here:
https://www.unz.com/article/marching-together-drifting-apart/
You are right that class analysis is important. But class is so obvious a factor in everything that it becomes almost irrelevant when one dismisses it.
Why aren’t professional sports teams held to the same standards?? I’d like the NBA to return to at least 40% white guys. And the NFL to have more white representation.
https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/average-iq-by-country
Comrade, I’ll hold out the faint hope that you are merely poorly informed.
Thanks
Yes, 1000 years, when psychopathic rule was forced onto white people, in cooperation with a demon from the Middle East. Oh, I understand, you think you escape that by travel to North America, and kill 200 non-jewish tribes for your black demon. Guess what, YOU are the problem.
Obviously the concept of ‘disparate impact’ vis-a-vis civil rights law stems from a number of court decisions, which raises the question of whether a president can countermand court decisions, or dilute their intended effect, by issuing an executive order.
Here is a good discussion of this with salient quotes from the EO:
National Law Review — President Trump Signs Executive Order Regarding Disparate-Impact Liability
Disparate impact is the result of disparate genetics, which is a fact of nature and not the fault of any human behavior, and thus impervious to social intervention. Marxist opinions about this are nothing else than racial Lysenkoism.
The issue should, of course, always be competency first. One can argue that the first reason the US is so dysfunctional today is that it has put competency last. It is always this way. Put the Earth first as the Greens do means putting people last.
Putting competency first means that all who cannot cut the mustard will suffer the fate of losers whoever they may be. This is obviously liberal anathema. Tough on liberals, and tough on losers. Still, this will not be the end of story. The argument of what competence means will then keep lawyers fat.
Society is all about cutting a piece of advantage out of the hide of others, unfortunately. It is also true that society is necessary and unavoidable for human survival. Go figure.
Remember the Lone Ranger warning his Indian friend Tonto about the Indian horde coming at them over the horizon and saying “WE are in trouble”? And remember Tonto’s response? “What do you mean WE, white man”?
Well, now you have it. The western West for the white man today.
“Black schools had strong discipline and scored well on tests”
Are you saying that blacks need strong discipline to score well? I got news for you. As a group they don’t want strong discipline. Some (10%) want it but the rest either don’t care or are outright hostile to discipline. You want more riots then discipline them and see what happens. Do some research on the Detroit riots of 1967.
The difficulty with “It’s the jews!” is that the deterioration of western culture was initiated by whites, not the jews. The hostory is long and far more complex than many on UR admit. Yes, jews have skillfully exploited the fault lines created in this decline, but the fault lines arose far earlier than jewish subversion.
Tracing back to the “start” of the decline is difficult, and there will be different opinions. The Enlightenment is a key marker here, but Voltaire wasn’t a jew (yet he viewed jews as an asset to subverting the traditional Christian core to the west). The Reformation was another key marker, though Luther was a Christian (yet his subversive operation was akin to jewish subversion of the Church’s authority). Heidegger and Husserl would go further back and cite the scientific revolution – yet Copernicus wasn’t a jew. Jews have always lurked in the shadows, but they were rarely in the front. The front line was composed of whites who, in rejecting Christianity, were affirming liberalism and rejecting reality.
The ‘start’ of the decline is legitimately debatable, but we can most easily conclude two things: 1) the jews were not at the center of the subversion, although they may have lingered in the periphery and profited from the decline; 2) the subversion was fundamentally directed against the Christian core to the west.
That is why it is so maddening that the “Men of Unz” are often so adamantly opposed to Christianity. In rejecting Christ, they align perfectly with the modernity/liberalism that led to the subversion of the west, and just so happen to perfectly align themselves with the jews.
Taylor is a hardcore Anglophile. And that means Philo-Semitism defines then culture he all but worships. Unlike the truly ignorant Taylor knows how thoroughly Jewed up the Brit WAP empire was even by the dawn of Victorianism. And he knows that that ws there era when the Brit Empire;ire began creating ways to promote the children of ‘elites’ from most parts of the empire too high imperial positions, at the same when the children of the clear majority of naives of the British IUsoes were denied even the right to enter a university as a student.
People such as him then want to think it all began only in 20th c America. And Taylor, in true Anglophile fashion, does not want tp upset any Jews because he persists in seeing Jews as soon-to-be allies.
All were under jewish influence and destructive, Zionist, “poison pill” ear-whispering. In short, all were Satanically possessed, just like their contemporary and co-conspirator colleague LBJ — Satanic pusher of the Big Brother warfare/welfare state, who history has exposed as a treasonous Zionist and Israel Firster.
http://www.judeofascism.com/2024/12/we-were-set-up-by-our-own-government-to.html
What is Zionism? It’s the Satanic, anti-Moses, anti-Christ, anti-Christendom golden calf Ponzi voodoo agenda and long-term plan to set “Israel” up as the international center, proprietor and controller of a global fiat currency.
The Satanic Golden Rule: He with the gold, makes the rules. He that keeps the Ponzi (the secrets of the Synagogue of Satan temple) controls the world.
From New England I think.
Taylor’s “blue ribbon panel” suggestion might actually be counterproductive. One reason that Trump has gotten so little pushback for ending anti-disparate impact policy is, ironically, because everyone is so propagandized about “equality” that Trump and his fellow travelers successfully framed this as “restoring equality under the law”, which it is, but if he creates a “blue ribbon panel” to remind everyone that blacks have lower average IQ, higher average violence, etc., it will also remind everyone why we had affirmative action in the first place: that blacks are never going to do the same as other races without a big thumb on the scale.
You or I or Jared may not care if different races do differently, but a lot of people do want to see equal outcomes, but at the moment they are stuck in a rhetorical bind. They can’t claim that blacks need affirmative action, because they have already claimed that blacks are the absolute intellectual and moral equals of everyone else. But if a Blue Ribbon Panel says, “Well actually, there are biological reasons…”, the Equalists will immediately start screaming for affirmative action again, restarting the 60-year-old cycle. Please, let us just be happy with victory.
Let sleeping dogs lie, hold the “equality under the law” frame, and let the chips fall where they may. Sponsoring a government panel formally to recognize black social underperformance would be perceived as rubbing their failures in their faces and result in new calls for “equity” and “reparations”, i.e., more anti-white laws.
Without affirmative action, blacks will get fewer lifeguard jobs and more school timeouts, and that’s okay. Different people are different. A government panel that says “cuz blacks are inferior” will give gratuitous credence to the inverted “systemic racism” meme.
Trump should publicly laud and celebrate James Watson, the co-finder of DNA who got cancelled for pointing out that he could clearly correlate genetic differences between various human sub-races to intelligence and behavioral traits.
That would be a great opening shot, and the young people might be interested to know why such a great scientist and researcher was cancelled for pointing out actual real biological differences in our species. We’re one race, with sub-races. No one thinks a Doberman is a poodle, but they’re both dogs. Why do we persist in thinking an Amazon rainforest primitive is exactly like a Northern European, Asian, or Arab?
That gives away the fact that the Jew agenda is destruction of Whites, not “equality”.
Are they not the ones who have been/are pulling the strings?
Does he say blacks rule the world, or does he say that blacks aren’t compatible with whites/white societies?
LiberalismSocialism is a cover for the naked self interest of the jews.Liberalism: https://www.britannica.com/topic/liberalism
No, it’s some of the Jews/non-Jews of European descent!
Hey JT, the 1990s and some Jewish talk show just called they want to know how you feel about Jews?
Do you have a reference for that article (e.g. which issue)? Ron has made indices for most issues of Foreign Affairs through 2001 available here.
https://www.unz.com/print/ForeignAffairs/
Thanks. I think it likely that is the intent of many of Trump’s EOs. With the ultimate goal being Supreme Court decisions. It will be interesting to see how many EO lawsuits are filed and how quickly they make it through the full judicial process. My thought is this tactic almost requires the lawsuits to reach the Supreme Court while Trump is in office (stone walling easier after he is out). Which might be difficult to accomplish. What do you think?
Why do they want control?
In what way is it at the expense of the majority?
Is the majority the global majority?
I think he may have overstated his point but I also think it is true that segregation and no welfare handouts were a big factor in controlling black behavior even in schools making those schools better. The black schools prior to 1970 were generally much different than the integrated schools of today where blacks are allowed to do whatever they want and there is zero discipline and many graduate totally illiterate. The schools back then were a reflection of the culture at the time where black behavior was not tolerated and they had a certain fear about them which is needed to control them.
At any rate, blacks across the board generally did much better in their own schools but that was due to a combination of factors. Jew run integrated education today is more about disenfranchising Whites especially White males, destroying White culture and using blacks as a weapon to damage Whites which works against both blacks and Whites. Now thanks to Jew conditioning, blacks are convinced they are victims of whitey and that informs their disgusting attitude of entitlement and hatred of Whites.
Because it’s a one-way street, that’s why. Affirmative action, DEI, racial quotas, etc. are all there to benefit non-Whites and non-White men in particular. I asked my feminist-lesbian sociology teacher in college if White men would have minority rights in 2050 when we became a minority, her answer was “No” because Whites in general would still hold power; this goes to show you their mindset. Nothing will ever be enough for them to give White men a special privilege, and if White men truly did become an endangered species, then minority rights would be done away with altogether. As Winston Churchill said – Muslims care a great deal about minority rights when they’re the minority. However, when they are the majority there are no minority rights… it’s the same with all races, except the suicidally altruistic Whites.
-Rooster
There has been anti white propaganda for a long time. Watch old TV westerns like Have Gun Willl Travel, Wanted Dead or Alive and such. At least a couple of episodes have a social justice message. They did not lay it on as thick as now, and the episodes were well written.
We not forget that on the Basroom series, the White martians are the evil ones. That was published in the 1920s.
Loving your neighbor is a bit difficult when the neighbor’s kids and relatives assault your wife (or husband) and kids. More so when the police are on the side of the assaulting kid if he’s Black. Even more so when the neighbor is being paid by some part of government to move in and assault your family members. Which is the story of White Flight.
The Christian version of this is that one “loves” one’s enemies. “Love” is a rather elastic word in European languages. It has included killing one’s enemies while “loving” them, the objective being to free Christians from being led into error, or for that matter sending enemies to Hell, where they were bound to go anyway, and using fire to do so to encourage others to repent. You can make very nearly anything into “loving” your neighbors. Right now (2025) it means “let your own family members be killed, and family assets taken by your neighbors. The assets in question mean entire cities full of assets (“little asses”, apparently).
As for civilizations outside the Christian sphere (including the anti-Christian and atheist Left), they do not believe in loving one’s enemies. They all believe in killing or possibly enslaving one’s enemies.
The US government governs by a combination of ethnic hatred and “engineering consent” (*** https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BIVYuWL73sM).
Video Link
The legitimacy of this government in the US has been destroyed:
1) The abandonment of US enforcement of “globalism”, which abandonment started with the USSR dissolution c.a. 1990, and finished with the Obama declaration of dictatorship (Obama’s “pen and phone” speech). The US will no longer suppress wars.
2) The inability of the Biden/Obama dictatorship/political machine to administer the US. This includes the COVID affair, the looting of major US corporations, the importation of ~10 million to ~20 million hostiles/slaves from the Third World.
All that remains now is the “cleanup”, the transition from a wartime US (“globalism”) to a peacetime US (which has abandoned the US anti-Soviet coalition that started with Breton Woods).
I’ll just say that there is a growing recognition among Blacks that the old US Southeast CA 1950 actually had a successful Black/White society, with a semi-independent Black social order that maintained peace with the White social order, and that the Southeastern bi-racial society was destroyed starting with LBJ’s Civil Rights act. The Blacks are not entirely happy with this — in fact, many of them are furious, especially after the detritus of the Third and Fourth Worlds were dumped on top of Black settlements in major US cities.
As for the Hispanics, they are as unhappy than the Blacks or more so. They’ve not only had the detritus dumped on them, their society is also being infiltrated by South American criminal organizations.
As for the Whites, they are not happy about seeing people like Obama being put into leadership/management positions and proceeding to steal what they can and destroy the rest (e.g. Boeing, air traffic control, health care, medicine, etc.
Nor is anybody happy about the Western laws that essentially make the evolutionary stable strategy (ESS) of male provisioning illegal, and the consequent world wide sub-replacement Total Fertility Rate (TFR) that has destabilized almost all industrialized countries as of 2025.
So we are starting to see an alliance of US ethnic and sexual groups to ending Civil Rights and ending the “reform” of marriage laws that make families a high casualty organization.
Slight problem: There is no political form known to humanity (H. Sapiens) that will cure the above.
* Obama marked the end of ethnic toleration. Put an ethnic into power and see the ethnic’s group attempt to destroy all other ethnic groups. No thanks.)
* Command economies have all failed — USSR, Venezuela.
* Democratic/Republic systems have all failed. The urban political machines coupled with Bernays’ techniques of “engineering consent” [1] failed with the end of the American Empire, when the American Federal government’s inability to govern (through obvious and gross incompetence of its political leaders) destroyed the betrayed trust that Bernays had depended upon. ( ** https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BIVYuWL73sM
Video Link)
* Ethnic political systems have, thus far, all been destroyed by fearful neighbors because they worked too well and pushed too hard ( e.g. the German empires of pre-WW I and pre-WW II. ).
Trump’s election was, in essence, like a tent in a ruined city, or perhaps the Papacy under the first Pope Gregory (AD ~600) in the ruins of a twice conquered and now deserted Rome. Gregory the Great had almost no physical resources, but he established the foundation of a religious power that intermediated between peasants and nobility, and was the foundation of AD 1900 Europe.
The Europeans, at least, need a new social system that encourages the male provisioning/protecting strategy, recognizes and accommodates ethnic differences (perhaps with a different elite description for each elite) and is consistent with very good capital allocation and utilization. Expect many things to change. And certainly several other things that are now not obvious.
And the above is why Trump appears to be a wrecking ball (AD 2025/05). Almost all of the existing political systems are inconsistent with industrial society. As a property developer, Trump realizes that the first step to rebuilding is demolition, and well aware that when demolishing it’s a bad idea to be let the debris hit you.
The current political systems are death for their societies, death either slow (persistent sub-replacement TFR) or possibly quick (nuclear warfare followed by chemical contamination from burned out cities). The current political systems are going to be replaced, if only by scattered bands of hunter-gatherers. The uncontacted Andaman Islanders might end up ruling s world that cannot support industrial or even tribal societies or, indeed, any human life in lands that once had cities.
************************************************************************
1] Governments with absolute power, including “manufacturing consent”, violate Pratchett’s Law: “Never give a monkey the keys to a banana plantation”. Other common violations are giving alcoholics and drug addicts large amounts of money.
wat is the purpose of having a “strong yt conscience” if you jus gonna self destruct???
Who exactly are the servants of Satan? – https://crushlimbraw.blogspot.com/2023/05/who-are-daservants-of-satan-does-it.html?m=0 – does it matter if they’re not jews?
Believe it or not, that question has an answer: Bomber borne nuclear weapons and possible attacks pm counter-value strikes on enemy industrial capacity and political structure.
Way back when, 1946, nuclear weapons were thought to be capable of destroying European/US/USSR civilization. This made the Cold War a matter of national survival for European/US/USSR civilization. Each side could, in theory, deny the other side enough Third and 4th World resources to preclude support of a 2nd strike retaliatory force and thus risk a disarming first strike.
So . . .
To win the Cold War, the US did several things.
One was Breton Woods and opening US markets to the world over US guarded sea lanes and in the context of a Pax Americana.
A second thing was to claim that oppression of Blacks in the US Southeast would lose the Cold War for the US.
This second thing eventually expanded into LBJ’s Civil Rights act, and (after Obama’s election) into abject confession by the US Federal Government that the Whites were racial inferiors in a moral sense to, say, the common cotton wood tree. After all, cotton wood trees had never enslaved anybody, and even their wood was too soft and weak to make weapons.
As far as the Jewish coalition goes, it was like a plant and the above was like a plowed field. I remember a lively debate in the Village Voice. The topic was: “Since the Jewish diaspora has done so well in the US, why is the Jewish Rabbinate trying to destroy the US?”. The debate was largely ignored by the Rabbinate, who simply said “Some Christian denominations believe that on the Last Day the Jews will all be converted to Christianity. That is intolerable, so Christianity must be destroyed, the US first as it is largely Christian and we Rabbis are right here in the US”. Insane, but what the Rabbis say, goes. By 1980 the general NYC Jewish community had grown visibly intolerant of non-Jews even visiting their neighborhoods, something that had not been apparent in the 1960s. Guggenheim gave an exhibition of “Nazi art” which consisted of oil paintings of happy White families with babies, who (surprisingly perhaps) were the targets of US Feminism.
Some say the West had societal PTSD after the World War era. You can see from the above that it was a bit more than that. OTH, the fear of nuclear warfare has been unrealistic for about 35 years now, and the West still claims that it has historically been staffed by racial inferiors in a moral sense to cottonwood trees, and is obsessing about events that happened centuries ago. Maybe it is PTSD.
In any event, we now have Trump, who has demolished what was left of the post-WW II system. In an analogical sense, Trump has withdrawn the US to its room where it can try to recover without the “aid” of psychologists who are paid by government to administer drugs that prevent recovery [1]. Might work, might not. OR, to use another analogy, the field no longer exists, and the plant now has to contend with the weeds.
***************************************************
1] Analogy here is to the COVID treatments (in particular the respirators) and the “immunizing” injections. Both apparently reduced COVID incidence only in the sense that the dead can’t catch or spread COVID. In that sense, cyanide would have been a far more effective treatment, being more lethal.
If disparate impact is bad why are the NBA and NFL allowed to be 85% black.? And what about our welfare system where blacks collect benefits at 5 times the rate of whites? And what about all the affirmative action programs? They are DESIGNED to favor blacks!
Yes, blacks are extremely inferior mentally and everyone knows it. It’s not just IQ tests. The evidence is everywhere.
1. Black-americans come in last in all standardized tests. Asian-americans do fine on all the tests so it’s not due to cultural bias in the tests.
2. Africa is by far the poorest and most backward continent on the planet. All of black africa is now controlled by blacks and has been for decades so it’s not due to racism.
3. No black has ever won a Science Nobel Prize unless you count one in 1979 for the semi-science of economics. They have won many nobels in non-brain fields like Peace and also in Literature so it is not due to racism.
4. Out of 1725 chess grandmasters in the world, only THREE are black.
5. 50 years of affirmative action special treatment and blacks have fallen even further behind. What does that tell you?
6. If there is a GIANT WHITE CONSPIRACY holding down blacks, why doesn’t it apply in pro sports.?
American Renaissance is headquartered in or around McLean, Virginia, and requires you to fill out a form that lets them perform a background check before you attend one of its meetings. What other organization is located in or around McLean, Virginia, and requires a background check before you attend their meetings?
Caveat lector: you are probably watchlisted just for looking at this article.
Obviously the concept of ‘disparate impact’ vis-a-vis civil rights law stems from a number of court decisions, which raises the question of whether a president can countermand court decisions, or dilute their intended effect, by issuing an executive order.
***************************************************************************
Biden defied the courts in cancelling student debt after being told repeatedly by the courts he could not do that. He even bragged, “The supreme court blocked it but that didn’t stop me.”
https://www.wsj.com/opinion/joe-biden-student-debt-forgiveness-supreme-court-0c5204fe
They’ll go back to China when you go back to … Poland (Berlitz has good courses in Polish AND Chinese)?
Disagree…
It’s all spelled out in their talmud.
ALL JEW$ WORLDWIDE consider themselves to be supremacists–their claims to their elevated spirituality is supposed to give them the right to rule over us gentiles.
The JEW$ who are protesting against the genocides in Gaza and the West Bank are not doing it out of altruism and concern for the human lives being extinguished, but are protesting out of self-interest. You see, if the world (finally) goes against them, they will be persona-non-grata all over the world.
A prime example of this is the NYC synagogue JEW$ and their child sacrifice tunnels which were “outed” by their own fellow JEW$ for protesting against the genocide in Gaza. Of course, NYC authorities allowed the tunnels to be covered up, destroying evidence in the process.
This same synagogue (which supposedly protested genocide) is now offering “Gaza Waterfront Property for Sale”.
This is PROOF that JEW$ are dishonest to the core…all of them.
Thank you for your concise response. It is appreciated.
I would like to add one thing…
Christianity (and by inference Roman Catholicism) was not intended to erase social and cultural boundaries.
It was on a purely spiritual basis that all of humanity was welcome within Christianity and Roman Catholicism. This in no way negated the necessity for each society to set its own mores, civil structure and conditions for being a part of civil society and enforcing proper social behavior.
Catholics and Christians of all types are welcome within the faith. This does not negate the need or desire for Christians to establish their own racially or culturally separate communities. There is absolutely nothing wrong with Christians who desire to do so.
Many people have the mistaken assumption that Christianity demands that racial or cultural boundaries be abolished. Nothing could be further from the truth.
Yes, there are Christian sects that preach (and desire) “multiculturalism and diversity”, much of this attitude being driven by outside (jewish) interests, in order to destabilize Christian and other cultural and societal preferences.
THAT is the jewish way–reserving social and cultural exclusivity for themselves while spreading their “multiculturalism and diversity” poison demanding that “the rest of us (gentiles)” give up social and cultural exclusivity.
All one has to do is see what jews did to Catholicism with the imposition of their “mandates” on the Vatican II Ecumenical Council. It is when jews got their “get out of jail free” card, being “forgiven” for the crucifixion and death of Jesus Christ, despite their hatred of Jesus Christ and Christianity that exists to this very day.
Let’s not forget the “slide” towards “anything goes” when it comes to sexual matters. The promotion of homosexuality by jewish interests has led to other sordid perverted practices being legitimized. From homosexuality and LGBTQXYZ perversions imposed on civil societies and on vulnerable children to pedophilia which is about to be “normalized”, even the Catholic Church is not immune from such sinful practices and heresy.
Normalizing what was once considered “mental illness” at the behest of jewish interests has only one solution…
The “Austrian painter” had the right idea–expulsion…
The “problem” remains…expulsion to where?
Best regards,
My religion says golden calf/Moneychanger ponzi voodooists and Black voodooists are not of the human race, but are of their father, the Devil. They’re Satanic, born and bred, lawless criminals.
And they’re knowingly Satanic. And their “liberal” allies are a party to their Satanism, and to their outlaw profiteering.
Unfortunately most people in the US do not know about the racial differences in intelligence. They have been trained to wear blinders while believing the question of nature over nurture is silly.
I wonder if a lot of people notice that black women are very aggressive and angry especially after being empowered by gender and race nonsense? In a sense this may be more obvious than the differences in males of the races even though the criminality of black men is off of all charts. Since men of all races are aggressive that difference may seem more like a matter of large degree whereas the difference in females registers as a more qualitative factor.
You make an accurate point. I attended a public magnet high school, with an “honors” level of teaching, in Detroit in the mid 1960’s. It was 50% black, and 48% white, of which around 20% of white was Jew. As you might expect, several factors played into that. Everybody had a nearby “neighborhood” high school they could attend, but went there, instead (it had 36 curriculae – everything from performing arts to air conditioning and refrigeration, to architedtural & design technology, commercial art, and a science & arts curriculum with college level science and English classes.) This PUBLIC school was downtown and short of a ride in, you rode a city bus to get there, all on your own. The colored kids generally lived closer to school (shorter trip in for most) and many of the Jew kids and some whites had to board 3 separate city busses to get there. Most important was the reason you went through all that to go there. It’s CULTURE! I know it, and I saw it.
It’s ignorant to assume that all whites (and all whatever else) have households with identical priorities. In my own lily white neighborhood, there were homes where education of the kids was lower ranked than other things. It had little to do with intellect, too. I saw intellectually “limited” kids (genetics? I don’t know, you don’t know) go somewhere because they had a sense of “it ain’t gonna be given to me.” They had a tougher time in school, but figured, oh well, nothing I can do except try harder, spend less time shooting baskets, spend less time goofing off with my friends. Babies aren’t born with those drives. They derive them from parents or other adults they are regularly exposed to – generally, in the home.
Although myself apparently way smarter than average (double promoted twice in elementary school – which was apparently based on an “IQ” type test we took) I was “surprised” to find colored kids from poorer neighborhoods of similar public school background quite a bit smarter than me in that high school. And the less “sharp” coloreds were way more driven to succeed in school than many/most of the whites I grew up with.
So, is it a race thing? Today it is. But in those days, apparently not. (which, I guess, is my point). It’s your culture – not your color. Keep fucking with the color thing guys! You’ve used this race bowlshit to create a monster – now, clearly to me, it’s totally beyond repair.
An afterthought: Lincoln and England et al who went through all that toil & trouble to grab Negroes off of the coasts of Africa for cheap labor (talk about immoral, you Evangelists!), didn’t have the insight to ship them back where they came from, even do some payback (perhaps, build up to date cities where they land) and, thereby skip the whole race thing that (predictable to anyone with half a brain in Civil War times) would avoid the fiasco that 100 years later would decimate America’s big cities – including Detroit – once (correctly) dubbed “Paris of the West.” You had your “Paris” and you lost your Paris – lesson learned? Maybe, but too late now!
BULL
SHIT
Why do they seek control? The motives mirror those of history’s most infamous rulers—the pharaohs of Egypt, Emperor Caligula of Rome, Hitler, and countless others. The answer, distilled to its essence, is power and wealth—fueled by insatiable greed.
Since antiquity, society has been divided between the working class, who labor to survive, and the elite, who profit from their toil. A worker exhausts themselves for 8–10 hours daily, only for the ruling class to claim a share of their wages—without lifting a finger. This exploitation is not a relic of the past but an unbroken chain stretching across millennia.
Even today, beneath the veneer of progress—our technology, science, and so-called enlightenment—the same oppressive hierarchy endures. The master and slave, the exploiter and exploited, persist as they did in the age of Christ. The tools have changed, but the system remains.
Mr. Tilley (not), I’ll show you step by step how it works. Please pay attention. Attention and awareness are key aspects of intelligence.
When you read my post you had a ‘reaction’, based on your conditioning, your past, carried in your memory. Including in your conditioning are articles and books you’ve read about intelligence, thoughts you have had about intelligence that carried in your memory, things you have heard people say about intelligence.
Had your intelligence been awake instead of so obviously asleep you could have had insight into how your conditioning was affecting your evaluation of my post.
You cannot ‘organize’ insight/intelligence any more than you can organize direct vision. If you look up at a cloudless sky you see, you perceive, blue, no organization necessary.
What happens is that your conditioning participates in your vision, often creating an emotion. For example, if you have been conditioned to be afraid of snakes and you see a snake your conditioning will participate in your vision, with a millisecond time lag, and you’ll feel afraid and wary.
Your intelligence doesn’t tell you there ‘is trouble outside’, that is obviously your conditioning. You’re confusing memory with perception. Your memory associates a certain sound with gunshots, certain sounds with police car sirens, certain lights with police car lights. This should be self evident. Simply imagine someone from a hunter gatherer tribe who had never heard a police siren and never seen police car lights and had never heard gunshots. Obviously they would interpret all the sounds and lights completely differently, because they have been conditioned in a different way, their memory is different.
Concerning your other example, as I said, there may be something measurable which has predictive value. However, in your example, you should be open to the possibility that the brilliant student is perceiving in real time some very subtle relationships between abstractions (in this case number). So, far from proving you right even your final example is proof that intelligence is a perception.
However that may be, I think I’ve proven to any objective observer that your own reactions and examples are illustrations of the way a person’s conditioning affects their response to a challenge, in this case an intellectual challenge. I encourage you at this time to watch your own conditioning at work as you read and take in my response. If you pay close attention to your reaction your intelligence will awaken and you will have insight into the relationship between your perception and your conditioning.
Whether they did better or not is hard to say, but they couldn’t blame the whites in the school for their deficiencies, could they? And they couldn’t cry racism over discipline. So even if the black schools were substandard, they would be superior to the black majority schools today, because discipline was enforced.
When the integrationists claimed that black schools were inherently inferior, it can only be because they view blacks to be inferior. Being separate can’t be inherently lesser unless the educational potential of the schools are lesser. If they are believed to be lesser, we can say that the real reason, as everyone knows, is the lesser potential of the students.
Good company must edify, low company must invariably degrade the student. Put all the Jews in a Jewish school and they must be degraded by being surrounded by themselves. If they were so intellectually superior they would shut the whites out of their own schools. But if the purpose is to control and dominate the institutions of the gentiles without their fundamentally Jewish character being known, then they will allow select gentiles (especially the girls!) into the elite schools.
We must only be concerned with the edification of our own people in the schools. Not with sacrificing the welfare of our children for the knife-wielding niggers and sows and the gooks gaming the system.
What if one places non-whites in a white environment (no special treatment), encourage miscegenation etc; is it theoretically possible that their descendents will end up (however long it takes) resembling white people?
Linus: “The front line was composed of whites who, in rejecting Christianity, were affirming liberalism and rejecting reality.”
LOL Here we have to remember that Christian “reality” is different than ordinary reality. If you don’t believe corpses can come back to life, you are rejecting “reality”.
Was it Cass Tech High School?
Why do they want power and control the wealth of society?
Haven’t the non-manual laborers contributed some inventions/knowledge etc?
Today the managers/engineers/scientists etc…?
Of course the more they interbreed with Whites the more they will resemble Whites. Mulattos have on average higher IQs than full blood Negroes.
Warning: Jared Taylor doesn’t have any white friends. He probably has half Japanese children, assuming he’s not gay. Either way, he has an agenda other than that of whites benefitting from viewing racial differences more realistically. Perhaps Taylor is harvesting immigrants for membership in MENSA. Maybe he gets paid to lobby for the Japanese by pretending to be advocating on behalf of whites. There’s even the possibility he’s an agent for the Japanese government.
What Taylor isn’t: a white male concerned about the plight of his co-ethnics.
Take everything he says with a large grain of salt.
There are a lot of people who don’t believe in the existence of race. Incredibly, they argue that race is a “social construct.
Is it the same, i.e. Europeans going to wilderness and building a society from scratch and Asians going to an existing society?
I understand your point, but we need a permanent end to this problem. Here is the permanent end: Americans declare loud and clear that the bad behavior by blacks is caused by genetics and that the bad behavior has to end now. Bad behavior must be punished by imprisonment and prevented by sterilization. Sterilize criminals. Sterilize welfare mothers. If all that sounds too harsh, offer deportation and exile as an alternative to any criminal or welfare mother who choses it. Give them $100K each and a plane ticket to the country of their choice. Strip them of their citizenship and never lay eyes on them again.
The Good Behavior Americans, some of whom will be black, will remain as US citizens in good standing.
Pass a constitutional amendment declaring all this: the Eugenics Amendment. Make it a provision of the amendment that Courts are not allowed to interpret it or interfere with any Executive enforcement of it. Judges who issue restraining orders shall be shot.
We either get our Eugenics Amendment or we lose. Not much in between.
And when I say they did better in their own schools under segregation I am in no way claiming they were near the level of Whites or producing an abundance of scholars. What I am saying is they were able to go to school without the teachers living in fear of being assaulted or raped and without the need for resource officers (off duty cops) present. Discipline was not like White schools but they knew if they behaved in a completely uncivilized fashion, local police might come in and crack their skull. Obviously most were just there passing time.
I’m not Polish you low-life filth. And where did you get that bullshit name N. Joseph Potts you troll filth. What the fuck are you and what’s you real lineage scum because it’s not Western European you filthy rat..And if your a juden rat F-off alien scum.
JT is a legend.
“Black schools had strong discipline and scored well on tests”
Only when compared to present day negroes. Otherwise I think you’ve seen Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner a few too many times.
Yes, perhaps that is the intent — but I honestly don’t think Trump is intelligent enough to come up with that idea himself — there seems to be some around him who are though, as the EO excerpts indicate the entire thing is fairly well written, and some thought went into it — there are good points that will give any fair-minded person something to think about (you can read the EO here).
Most important ‘disparate impact’ cases were decided decades ago, but a couple were decided more recently:
Recent Supreme Court Decisions on ‘Disparate Impact’
Meacham v. Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory (2008) and Ricci v. DeStefano (2009) — in the Ricci case, the Supreme Court seemed to affirm the validity of the idea of potential liability under civil rights law due to ‘disparate impact.’
So unfortunately it looks like potential liability under civil rights law resulting from practices that result in ‘disparate impact’ is firmly established — given the blanket taboo on acknowledging racial differences, i.e. as the cause of the ‘disparate impact’, I’m not sure how likely meaningful change is.
Every one of the Burger court should have been given the rope. It was treason. Failure to hold the court responsible is unforgivable.
N. Joseph Potts, it took me a little looking at your name to see how Jewish it is. Now I can’t unsee it.
In situations where there is intense complexity, attempting to grapple with all the details foils what can be accomplished. An example is catching a ball. Myriad actuations and adjustments to the musculo-nervous system are made for a successful catch, programmed by a history of experience, and overriding these details with conscious intrusion will inevitably cause an error; a failure. In addition to that problem, pertaining to a very complex situation that is nevertheless quite manageable with skillful intuition, delving into cul-de-sacs within the larger issue will inevitably derail good thinking and confuse the issue.
A novice thinker may well believe that he can better the “juvenile map of reality” of just looking at the ball and responding with an urge to simply reach for the ball and grasp it. But if he tries instead to understand the kinesthetics and physiology of the situation to better catch the ball, he will likely just get a smashed nose, or some other embarrassment, his trust in advice from a know it all sophist notwithstanding.
The problem is actually quite simple, though jews love to make it too complex to handle.
Oops, apologies for insulting your parasitic 1% white elite family members Prickvaltar.
the ones with higher IQs than blacks and hispanics
False, as that is a myth pushed by idiot whites, who gave them entry into every white-collar corporate industry and blue-collar businesses (gas stations, convenience stores) through ‘no penalty foreigners-only loans’ where now there is not a corporate office anywhere in America where at least half the floors/departments are entirely Indian, both green card and visa.
Way to fucking go high IQ white america.
“Indians” were present, and as numerous (density-wise) as Palestinians were when European Jews decided to build their society in the Middle East (both colonizers deny this).
Neither of these two invaders entered, or adapted to the legacy society. They both ERADICATED the legacy societies (and most of the people who made them up) and established their own atop the ruins of the previous.
I can’t say I see those accomplishments as superior to the contributions I have so far noted from the invaders (of the US) from Asia. The comparison MIGHT change in eons to come. You and I will likely be long gone by that time.
Because it’s a one-way street, that’s why. Affirmative action, DEI, racial quotas, etc. are all there to benefit non-Whites and non-White men in particular.
Bullshit. Goy whites still control many industries and wield considerable power. Any reduction in that, then fucking blame the goy whites who willingly allowed infiltration by and accepted servility to……….jew whites.
Or just continue taking the usual easy path of ‘least resistance thinking’ 9as most 99%’er peon whites do) and keep blaming everything directly on negroes.
Jared Taylor’s parents were from Virginia, which in the early 20th century was solidly the South (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jared_Taylor)
Taylor’s wife Evelyn Rich is a yankee who has a Ph.D. from Boston University in Sociology and African-American Studies (https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=93855).
Lots of folks have noted this is Jewish influence, but have ignored/forgotten it was WASPs as well.
This was really a Jewish-WASP alliance against Ellis Island Catholics (Irish, Italian, and to a lesser extent Poles, French-Canadian, and German Catholics) and Southern protestant Scots-Irish, using blacks as the cat’s paw.
WASP elite hated losing control of America to the Catholics and especially the Irish; e.g. the loss of Boston from Brahmin stronghold to the Honey Fitz-types was a huge blow ego-wise to the WASP powers of our nation. Ellis Island’s overload pissed the WASPs off to no end, but in the face of overwhelming numbers they couldn’t do much at first. Aligning with Jews to use Civil Rights laws to screw over the city Catholics who had taken over was sweet revenge. Punishing Scots-Irish in the South first with black integration was a welcome first blow and a test run from the WASP point of view.
Earl Warrren? Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.? William Douglas? Harry Blackmun? All WASP elitists.
Those old judges who put this evil into place WASPs by and large. And knew what they were doing, with Jewish egging on.
Stop financing your own destruction by watching professional ‘sports’. If a majority of white men stopped watching professional sports then the scam would be over quickly.
Sport is like sex, it’s for doing not watching. In 24 years of going to the US to ski I’ve probably done about 300 days skiing. During all those visits I saw exactly one black skiing and he was a bodyguard for the white guy with whom he was skiing. So stop watching ‘sport’ and go skiing instead.
yup
8 storys high, on Second & Henry
same school Diana Rossi attended (my dad insisted she was Sicilian).
There are a lot of people who don’t believe in the existence of race. Incredibly, they argue that race is a “social construct.
*************************************************************
And yet they support race based affirmative action.
Which makes them a far greater menace to society than they would otherwise be.
Every one of the Burger court should have been given the rope. It was treason. Failure to hold the court responsible is unforgivable.
*****************************************************************
It was the burger court that gave us not only roe v wade but even worse, they gave us plyler v doe. In that case the court ordered the states to give free k-12 to illegal aliens! That 5-4 decision ( burger dissented BTW) has cost america TRILLIONS of dollars.
The constitution says courts are not allowed to write laws -“All legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a congress of the united states,” – but they took their mexican bribes and wrote a law there.
And what about our welfare system where blacks collect benefits at 5 times the rate of whites?
As ‘white high IQ’ is continually touted here on Unz, why the hell are ‘high IQ whites’ needing welfare in the first place?
If disparate impact is bad why are the NBA and NFL allowed to be 85% black.?
The same question can be flipped and asked of Golf. But no race should be allowed to make millions of dollars in something so non-productive and useless as sports, any sports.
They are DESIGNED to favor blacks!
Oh well, talk about signs of the fucking anti-christ. Whites can always stop watching the fucking games and going to sporting events.
And what about all the affirmative action programs?
Jiminy-fucking Xmas, another one. AGAIN, AA is not a magic ticket to a ghetto lottery Potsie.
And not only is it NOT a fucking Wonka ticket, what little benefit it offers, affects all coloreds not just negroes.
When I am put on a hiring team, I am the only white who does not conspire in advance to block the hiring of whichever negro candidate appears on the Zoom call.
Tell me DaVinci, how does affirmative action circumvent that? I am all for blocking an incompetent DEI candidate with a degree in african pottery…………………………………
But I never did see the sense in turning away a black having a verifiable background and credible references in favor of an H1-B Indian with a clearly doctored resume which the whites on my hiring team who outvote me do, because……..
‘Hey! At least Rajput is not a nigger!’
Only for Rajput to later be promoted into corporate management by those same whites, only later to send those same high IQ whites to the nearest food pantry by job displacement.
Fucking mayonnaise nitwits.
Whites didn’t want integrated schools, JEWS did.
For the same reason that they want unlimited immivation from culturally incompatible mystery meat countries…. because then (((they))) don’t stand out as much compared to the exotic invaders.
Reminds me of Sir Arnold Lunn.
How did we get these vicious laws? We got them the same way we get all laws — through elected representatives; through voting.
Lol imagine being idiotic enough to believe this!
It’s certainly not going to take women out of the workplace and put them back in the home.
How much do you get paid to come here and stir up shit among White men and women?
Mr. Taylor, for the first time that I know of, came out and finally admitted quite unequivocally that White men started all the “disparate impact” shit. Good on him.
I assume Mr. Taylor likes having DJT in the White House. One sure way to fuck that up is to nuke his coalition by alienating White women. Anyone who is willing to risk that is a fucking traitor and no mistake.
I can already see the manosphere and incel stupidity penetrating MAGA, and that will be the end of it. It would be different if they actually had something relevant and useful to say, but of course they don’t. All they do is assume that bad women judges are bad because they are women, and bad male judges are bad for some unspecified reason other than the fact that they’re men. This ridiculous argument is literally all they have. It is so spectacularly stupid it’s hard to believe that so many literate people who don’t suffer any obvious intellectual deficit take it seriously.
It wasn’t blacks who pushed the nonsense into law and policy, it was leftist women, the MOTHERS of the Boomers. Along with help from their pussy-worshipping, power-hungry sycophant simps, of course.
Meanwhile, here on planet Earth, the 88th Congress that passed the CRA was over 97% male, and there was not a single woman on the Warren court that formulated the disparate impact doctrine. If they were all marionettes controlled by the international matriarchy, maybe you could actually cite some evidence to that effect.
Time to sue the federal government and the internal revenue service for the disparate impact of taxes on whites and Asians who pay in a disproportionate amount and receive disproportionately less services in return.
Should be an open and shut case for any hungry lawyer out there wanting to file a class action suit.
It might be hard to comprehend for people who lack empathy, but the simple facts are: Different people have different experiences and circumstances in life that may lead them to less desirable outcomes, independent of their inherent merit. When an entire group of people, over generations, centuries even, are subjected to a wide range of discriminatory and racist practices, like slavery, red-lining, Jim Crow laws, lynch mobs, prosecutions based on lies (e.g. Central Park Five), and many, many more, it can impact them and their children, even after some of these practices aren’t prevalent. What you retarded nazi cunts call “woke”, “DEI”, etc. are just acknowledgements of this that try to compensate for this, and right the wrongs an oppressed demographic has been dealt. You all have never walked a mile in their shoes, and therefore, you can never judge them. Furthermore, all of the relevant studies have shown that employers are more likely to interview and hire white prospective employees than Black prospective employees, even with the exact same résumé. So, any illusion of this being about “meritocracy” is, of course, just a retarded nazi lie.
Look at me, trying to explain basic empathy to a bunch of retards whose political party called it a weakness.
I tend to think they didn’t understand the scale of what was coming at them. Maybe Douglas did but he wanted the change.
Though we’ve been taught to think of the Warren court as some period of exceptional judicial talent, I think on the whole they were fielding a weak bench. Conservatism, an extension of Protestantism at the time, was obsessed with defeating an ascendant communism at all costs and saw small moves in that direction as necessary to keep communism at bay. It is helpful to consider that secret American foreign policy post WW2, as demonstrated in the actions of the CIA, was to install moderately Leftist governments in post war Europe in the hope of fending off communist governments. To do that the CIA worked to ensure the defeat of conservative governments. This plan, called the Braden Plan, named for CIA big wig Tom Braden, later co-host of the Cross Fire tv show, was briefly discussed in the following broadcast:
Video Link
Let me answer your question by asking: Why would, for example, Tutankhamun build a massive pyramid as his tomb—one that could also serve as a storage room for all the possessions he used in life? Perhaps his greed led him to believe he could somehow use those items in the afterlife.
A system based on greed and self-interest tends to think in terms of monopoly—that is, monopolizing everything imaginable, from land and scientific discoveries to media, labor, and mineral resources. The dollar empire has long been in this stage and is now nearing its end. To maintain dominance, it seeks to control (or monopolize) energy trade, cheap labor, sea corridors, space exploration, rare earth minerals, and even Russia’s vast titanium mines, among other things.
Monopolizing smaller players is relatively easy, but when it comes to civilizational states like China, Russia, and Iran, the challenge is entirely different. Ideally, a well-functioning system employs a balanced combination of socialism and capitalism, overseen by responsible governance—a model promoted by China and Russia under the emerging multipolar world order.
It’s called the weak analogy fallacy. Look it up. And try again. I would hope that when you try this quite despicable type of trick ‘argument’ with your twelve year old son he can immediately see through it but given his genetic inheritance perhaps he just shrugs and says ‘oh, I guess you’re right Dad’.
One can take a two second video of catching a ball. It’s a specific physical action. Now show me a two second video of the relationships of human society.
Analogies are like switchblades. When handled correctly they can serve a valuable purpose. Now look at your hands. Blood everywhere and you’ve lost a thumb and three fingers.
Rosie: “Lol imagine being idiotic enough to believe this! ”
LOL Rosie the feminist harpy is back, with the electroshock gel still on her forehead!
You’ve been away quite a while, harpy.
Did they finally let you out of the nuthouse, or did you escape?
You might have a point if this analysis was limited to class oppression, which is clearly malicious and systematic oppression over thousands of years by an exclusive elite. Sure, but indulging blacks with special provisions is just a civilisation committing suicide. Blacks are half child and half devil. No need to have ever given a single shekel.
“Does he say blacks rule the world”
Blacks don’t rule the world but they sure rule the streets.
You do not understand analogies. An analogy only needs to be like what it’s compared to in one relevant aspect. I am unsurprised that you were unable to identify that aspect in my analogy.
“One can take a two second video of catching a ball. It’s a specific physical action. Now show me a two second video of the relationships of human society.”
Nice straw man. And unhinged ad hominem.
I more or less agree with that, except maybe the last sentence, but again, must the path from here to there go through “blue ribbon panels”? Why not skip the racial coding and just go straight to “bad behavior will reap just desserts”? Imprison, deport, and sterilize away. You and I and Jared know this will disproportionately be blacks, but so what? Different people are different. That’s okay.
Making the conversation about blacks via a Blue Ribbon Panel just reactivates the woke race virus and puts us back at square one.
The “conservative” wing of the Synagogue of Satan was obsessed with defeating the left-wing of the Synagogue of Satan? You’re funny.
A more accurate observation is “Christ was obsessed with defeating the hebroid Satanists who had infiltrated and taken over the Hebrews”.
Satanic-infiltrated “Protestantism” was never obsessed with defeating its (((Marxist))) partners in crime; it simply didn’t want the Golden Calf/Fiat Ponzi to be so blatant, and felt an illusion of Capitalism and freedom was the better way to go about enslaving and destroying the world, which is at the heart of what these Satanists really want.
You see, they’re stunted children who want all the shiny objects for themselves, all of Christ’s authority for themselves… and they never, ever want another Moses to rise again and give them forty whacks, which they know is exactly what they deserve, and they know is again coming their way sooner or later.
They call this “End of days”, and it will be… for them and their Black voodoo partners in crime.
I’ve been criticizing grown men for supporting professional “sports” for more than a few decades. I never watched that garbage…
Not only the “National Felon League” and the “National Basketball Association” but even that bastion of truly professional skills, NASCAR has been infected with “woke” ideology. When (((they))) banned the “Stars and Bars” flag, a part of their history, NASCAR sealed its fate, along with the promotion of substandard “affirmative action” black driver “bubba” wallace complaining about “racist” garage door pulls, triggering a full-blown FBI investigation, NASCARs fate was set. To add insult to injury, recently “bubba” wallace’s typical black violent tendencies were on full display.
Let’s not forget the billions spent by grown male “sports fans” on sports ball jerseys, caps and other “trinkets”, overpriced game tickets and taxpayer-subsidized stadiums (playpens), all to benefit the (((owners))) of the criminal, steroid-addled costumed players who are paid millions of dollars to play children’s games.
“Bread and circuses” which are provided to “quell the masses” are just as successful now as they were in ancient times…
It is disgusting to see grown men spout off useless and meaningless sports statistics and the adulation that they give these costumed players (actors) while not giving a damn about the direction this country is taking. It is just sickening to see grown men debase themselves with that mind-numbing garbage.
I realize that sports ball is “entertainment for the masses” and do look down derisively on grown men who sport their favorite sports ball players clothing or other accouterments.
I think to myself: “don’t you have anything better to do?”
There are much better things for grown men to do than watch sports ball sports.
Build something…repair something…study philosophy or technical journals on something that interests you, make something better, improve yourself and your standard of living and devices…use your wisdom and knowledge to get your fellow men to THINK for themselves, not what to think, but HOW to think and to not just accept the pablum, lies and falsehoods of the mainstream media and useless professional sports.
Message to grown men: Get away from the sports ball. You are much better than that…
“Multiculturalism and diversity for thee but not for me” is the jewish mantra.
Whites may have been involved in the “civil-rights (for everyone but Whites)” movement but “the elephant in the room” is the jews who really spearheaded the so-called “civil rights” movement.
“Freedom of association”, a Constitutionally-protected “right” was eviscerated with the passage of the so-called “public accommodation” part of the “civil-rights” act. but only used against us Whites. Every other “race” was and is still free to discriminate against us Whites based on race.
I came of age during the first so-called “civil-rights” movement and observed for myself the underhanded dealings, the demonization of us decent, law-abiding Whites, and in general, the deterioration of civil society.
Almost all of the “civil-rights” workers and demonstration “handlers” were of one persuasion–New York based leftist communist jews. They cared not one wit about true “civil rights”, but were there to create hate and discontent among their black charges (who were too stupid or naive to see that they were being used to suborn and destroy legitimate government and society–a favorite communist tactic).
These New York-based jew “carpetbaggers” fomented their hate and discontent, only to become future “civil-rights” attorneys, race-hustlers, and America-hating leftist communists…and the ADL and $PLC being prominent instigators of violence against us whites.
Those of us whites who were in the middle of this “civil-rights” revolution had a saying: “Behind every negro, there is a jew”. No truer words were ever spoken.
Let’s not forget jewish infestation of the nation’s education and entertainment systems, (which continues to the present day), in which they still spread their jewish supremacist poison.
The so-called “non-violent civil-rights demonstrations” were anything but “non-violent”. Robberies, rapes, and other criminal acts committed by jewish civil-rights handlers and their black “pets” were common, but never reported, as even the “mainstream media” of the day was “in on the game” and conveniently turned off their cameras during the acts of violence. You see, even then,”creating crises” was a part of the agenda.
The “beginning of the end” of America was the use of federal troops against us White Americans, which, in itself was a violation of “posse comitatus”–the prohibition of the use of federal troops for domestic law enforcement purposes.
President Eisenhower, being of jewish extraction showed his visceral hatred of White gentiles by using federalized troops to suppress constitutionally protected dissent.
As most Whites were (and still are) law-abiding, they (we) were “steamrollered” by the use of federal troops to crush our (White) honest dissent.
We never recovered from those unconstitutional actions. It was all downhill from there…
We are living with the consequences of the so-called “civil-rights” act to this day.
Read what you wrote carefully (I know you haven’t).
Your own IQ is showing. Such as it is.
They’re ALL “partners in crime”!
Aren’t they?
It is idiotic to the max to harp on about meritocracy, and insist that it is inherently connected with anti-whiteness or pro-whiteness. I wish that Jared Taylor’s voice was simply not allowed in any external forum, as he is decades behind current social developments.
In the current world, everything is global. Remember, guys – ~30% of the world is East or South Asian. And both of these groups are incredibly high performers. (Feel free, my fellow geniuses in the Unz comment section, to pick-out the South Asian category and bunny-trail on that one single issue, ignoring the entire rest of my comment!)
Both of these groups are immigrating to the United States at incredibly high rates, and will continue to do so for the foreseeable future. As for South Asians, they are the highest-achieving group in the United States, and they ALSO have higher Total Fertility Rates than white people.
We can reasonably expect that the USA will be over 10% Asian by the time that immigration from Asia subsides.
Now, when the USA is 10% Asian, if we have anything approaching a meritocracy, it will be virtually impossibly for white people to compete for high-status jobs. We can see the harbingers of this already in Ron Unz’s statistics about racial composition of top universities: white gentiles are a small minority already! Asian+Jewish is a majority! Whether you believe in nature or nurture, this future will happen, beyond the shadow of a reasonable doubt. I happen to be more on the nurture side, thanks to the seminal writings of Sasha Gusev. But it does not matter, because toxic caucasian behavior and parenting, and excellent Asian parenting, are not going to change greatly in the next 300 years.
Whites will find ways to make money on BS financial schemes and blue-collar businesses, but we will never achieve high-status.
This absolutely sucks. This is not a recipe for happy people. Once we are at the bottom, we will probably realize that it is inherently miserable to be at the bottom, thanks to a psychological reality known as the “Winner-Loser effect.”
I fully understand that the genius commenters on Unz will put up a heroic mental battle against the misery of Loserdom. We have a meekness-culture, inspired by Christianity, which hates ambition (the Bible literally says that selfish ambition causes one to go to Hell), and which insists that Joy comes from meekly accepting your submissive position in God’s Great Chain of Being. I know it very well. I also know that it doesn’t work – it just forms an idiology that represses negative feelings from the Winner-Loser effect. The result of this mass-repression are not good, because repressed feelings do not disappear, they simply leave our sight, and thus, become harder to control. But white people will force themselves to do it (to be fair, whites in the rural South like much Jared Taylor’s social circle might hardly ever see Asian and Jewish people, and might have no flippin’ idea what’s really going on in their own country), and Asian Americans and Jewish Americans likewise will exert pressure on us to repress our negative feelings regarding our loserdom.
Disparate impact is rooted in Marxism, which is rooted in Marxist-Zionism, which is rooted in Judeofascism.
Nice try though, trying to scapegoat Christendom, which is spiritually rooted in Moses-Christian thought, history, and principles.
Did you get your muse from mentally ill Nietzsche or Judeofascist Adolf Shiklgurber, a Masada-like suicide case just like his fanatical Marxist-Zionist brethren (who are rooted in the Golden Calf Ponzi, human sacrifice, slaving, and other warped, twisted, savage and primordial evil)?
Name a group of people who haven’t been discriminated against or enslaved. More whites were stolen from Europe and enslaved in Africa and the middle east than were ever taken from Africa. And slavery was a globally universal condition until anglo Saxon whites ended it by force.
Red lining is a natural result of their own criminality and their own destruction of property values. Consider it a communal credit score and entirely earned by the content of character displayed there in.
Jim Crow – why should safe homogeneous and functional communities not be allowed to keep out elements entirely destructive towards their social cohesion?
Prosecutions based on lies? How dare you “Samuel Levine” when your hollow hoax tops that list by 6 million lying miles?
And finally; why do you think none of this should apply to your tribe and their criminal “nation”?
The only thing creepier than an article by Jared Taylor is when Robbie George takes up his guitar:
Video Link
And thank you for providing more evidence for my point: How likely are you to hire a Black person, even an overqualified one, if you think like this? How likely are Black people to be given the resources to realize their potential, when people who think like you have influence? As long as there are retarded nazi cunts who think like you, Black people will remain discriminated against, and consequently, have test scores, education levels, certifications, and the like that don’t reflect their full potential. That’s why things like affirmative action are necessary.
I guess you would love to see KOG flown back to the US to put feminist harpies back in our place along with all his gangster homies, isn’t that so, Dr. Robert Moron?
The USA is already effectively majority Asian influence with respect to high status jobs. Who do you think is getting hired now?
The Asian CEOs and (((others))) are continuing to bring in ever more jeets, gooks, and chinks to fill those jobs.
Notice that the elites like Gates and (((Brin and Page))) have all brought in . Indians to run their companies?
From Google search:
We have a meekness-culture, inspired by Christianity, which hates ambition (the Bible literally says that selfish ambition causes one to go to Hell), and which insists that Joy comes from meekly accepting your submissive position in God’s Great Chain of Being.
You’re an idiot. Hatred of selfish ambition is rooted in pagan philosophy. There’s a really interesting, obscure little book you might want to read called The Republic by a guy named Plato who lived half a millennium before Christ. Jesus just noticed that, unfortunately, the good and wise do not seek power to avoid being ruled over by the wicked and foolish. Rather, the scum rises to the top. Instead of philosopher-kings, we have treacherous and corrupt oligarchs. That being the case, you have to flip over the money tables every so often.
Marx: Christianity is no good because it promotes resignation as the opiate of the people. (Your argument is a restatement of this.)
Nietzsche: Christianity is no good because it inspires the weak and inferior to attack and destroy the strong and superior.
Both of these are, at best, half-truths and oversimplifications, but they serve their purpose for people looking for a reason to hate other Whites.
As for Jared Taylor’s failure to recognize Asian immigration as a catastrophe, I quite agree. Meritocracy is irrelevant to our situation now.
Lol. You’re right. Ethnocentric Whites run the country. Hence, all the replacement-level mass migration and demonization of White people.
There is nothing more despicable than your weaponization of White altruism against us while you never, ever even acknowledge let alone object to Jewish or Asian elite over representation as anything other than merited success.
We see your cynical self-interest.
Read what you wrote carefully (I know you haven’t).
Typical remark from a snide 99%’er peon white cool whip-hued turd.
‘N. Joseph Potts’
Yep, that is definitely what a human 0, who’s nutsack is not even a matched set, (also where said human 0 uses Nair hair remover on the remaining testicle) would pick for his username.
Unlike you, I do not possess a mentally aberrant egotistical need to go back and read over my posted comments multiple times in order to feel superior to other Unzers.
‘Ha-ha! Ha-ha! He made a grammatical faux pas! Thereby reversing the point of his statement! Guffaw! Guffaw!’
Your own IQ is showing. Such as it is.
My own IQ is enough to understand that you need to visit the rail system of any blue city, where the combination of your mouth and 99%’er high white IQ will make you the star of your own media article:
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/05/border-nightmare-man-charged-raping-corpse-nyc-subway/
I’m sure you will reanimate just to correct the illegal alien on how he’s ‘doing you all wrong’
But hey! At least he’s not a nigger!
Chris Moore: “Disparate impact is rooted in Marxism, which is rooted in Marxist-Zionism, which is rooted in Judeofascism. Nice try though, trying to scapegoat Christendom, which is spiritually rooted in Moses-Christian thought, history, and principles.”
It’s simply an historical fact that American white Christian men gave niggers citizenship and rights equal to whites more than 150 years ago. That’s indisputable, and that’s the “long history of equality” I’m talking about. Perhaps (in fact, probably) you are crazy and/or historically illiterate enough to deny that America was Christian in the nineteenth century, but that doesn’t change anything.
If they weren’t acting in accordance with Christian thought, what was it then? Atheist thought? Buddhist? Marxist? LOL No, they were acting in accordance with Christian preaching. The idea of disparate impact only can arise, and only be justified, after an underlying Christian assumption of basic racial equality has already been made.
You and I will likely be long gone by that time.
Finally, something to fucking look forward to.
Levine is an anti-Christ, Judeofascist rat. So was Adolf Shiklgruber. So was Marx. Nietzsche was a proto-Nazi, White useful idiot and mental case, but in line with the Judeofascists.
In fact, the entire “Jewish Century” intellectual framework is Satanic jew trash.
I know I’m at the “antisemitic” extreme, but I honestly believe we’re approaching the point where Moses’ final solution is doable, Christ willing.
Moses noticed that hebroid rabble are prone to evil, and whacked the worst of them. Jesus just flogged them from the temple, but when Jesus Christ ruled Christendom, it was permanent payback for what these scum did to him. Moses, however, was restrained.
I don’t think he will be, nor should be, this time. Satan can only keep Moses-Christianity down so long. When it gets rolling again, all of these problems are going to swept away in a heartbeat.
BTW, here’s what “Israel” thinks of women.
https://alethonews.com/2025/05/04/israeli-pride-celebrating-rape-in-the-zionist-entity/
No Jewish friend ever tried to preach to me how superior, clever, etc. they were. These tended to be secular Jews. Maybe they were hiding their true beliefs, and maybe they still went secretly to the synagogue while pretending to be secular. I have heard other Jews, no friends of mine, showing off loudly in public about their superiority.
I admit that I have nothing interesting to add to the discussion but I am always struck by how similar having courts decide what some enterprise’s “business needs” are is to having worker’s committees making management decisions in the early Soviet Union. And I’m also struck by how mainstream conservatives simply absorbed the morality of the left.. There were no protests in the street from mainstream conservatives. Instead, they let Marxists dictate a fully artificial morality.
Rock climbing and boxing. Only real sports, according to Robert Graves.
Moses, if he was real, was an early lawgiver. He didn’t restrain them. He helped to establish them. Regarding, Jesus, if he was really the enemy of the Jews, then why didn’t he repudiate Judaism? Why did he claim to be fulfilling prophecies? Why did he believe that Jewish scripture was holy and why did he continue to worship Yahweh? If he didn’t believe that Jewish scripture was holy, then why was he arguing with Jewish authorities about the correct interpretation? Why didn’t he, *instead*, declare that Jewish scripture was *unholy*.
What a sad commentary on the American value system. We have to start looking at merit again because of pressure from China.
“The last temptation is the greatest treason: to do the right deed for the wrong reason.” — T.S. Eliot, Murder in the Cathedral
Politicians in America are elected by women. Women are the reason for the Democratic Party’s current orientation. This is a problem developing for a hundred years now, and it’s not getting better.
Sam, I’m not going to say that you’re use of the phrase “retarded Nazi c***” is growing on me, but I do agree that given the diversity of our population; given the variety of experiences that diverse groups have had; and given the need to truly integrate everyone into a cohesive social fabric, we do need programs such as “affirmative action” and “Diversity Equity and Inclusion (DEI).” We may not need those EXACT programs, but we need something like them. We need a way to welcome people of all races and religions and make them truly and really integrated into American culture. The irony with that is that many legacy Americans, many white Americans, also need to be integrated into this culture.
Where we disagree is, I do not think this is a Nazi website in any literal sense. Ron Unz has his roots in libertarian ideology (think about his connection to Reason magazine), and I think he is just trying to lay down the principle that as deranged and “RNC” (in the Sam Levine sense) as many of these views are, there is a basic right of self-expression that needs to be defended even when we disagree with the specific content.
I have been going around on various articles and putting warning labels (Caveat Lector) because I think there is a decent chance that at least some of these articles are placed here to attract and then track right wing lunatics. This is just my opinion because I cannot for the life of me understand how someone as intelligent as Ron Unz could seriously embrace Holocaust denial.
More likely is that “special treatment” of niggroes will be driven by the fact that something will have to be done to make them useful and at least semi-productive in order to justify their “care and feeding.” As society becomes more and more technologically advanced, the low-IQ niggroes will be less and less able to adapt to it.
Given the disastrous results of the Brown decision over the last 70-plus years, one would be justified in thinking that the forced integration of schools was a deliberate effort by TPTB to destroy both black AND white education. In considering the plans for us serfs that TPTB are no longer even bothering to hide, this makes perfect sense.
Shiloh lives in Minnesota. I would be curious to know if her attitude towards $#!+$k!n$ mirrored that of her fellow Minnesota white women (overwhelmingly liberal in attitude and ideology) before she became one of their victims.
Unkind and unflattering things said on anonymous internet forums don’t prove there are still “systemic barriers” — quite the contrary. There’s a massive multi level infrastructure — public and private, federal state and local, secular and religious, corporate and non-profit, amateur and professional — devoted to hunting down and punishing the slightest anti-black speech and action, and to push whites aside regardless of merit and shove blacks into position regardless of the lack thereof. And yet the massive failure of it all shows that decades, generations of “affirmative action” and other racial preferences have proven is that no matter how much you bend over backwards for them, blacks, AS A WHOLE, will never, ever catch up.
Orientals and Jews were systematically discriminated against, too — but interesting they weren’t called stupid. Despite coming from abject poverty, not being able to call on a common language, religion, and cultural familiarity to at least mitigate the discrimination they faced, they clawed their way out of the slums and into the elite via IQ, grit, and effort.
It’s because they’re stupid that they’re regarded as stupid.
And no, don’t bother to point to this or that smart one. The point I’m making, obviously, is that on average and overall they’re less intelligent.
There are tall women and short men, but overall, men are taller, and it’s genetic, and that fact remains no matter how much it’s suppressed. It’s the same with race and intelligence.
So; what you call “legacy Americans” need to be sent to reeducation camps? How very progressive of you and how utterly predictable.
You can’t understand how someone as literate and intelligent as Ron Unz can “embrace Holocaust denial?” Then obviously you haven’t read any of his highly informed articles on the subject of that completely farcical work of propaganda fiction.
May your chains weigh lightly upon you, and may posterity forget you were our countrymen.
Yes, the idea that fundamentally equal “reasonable souls” exist. According to Roman Catholic teaching, Jesus Christ had a “reasonable soul”, and so in this sense, every apterous biped is the fundamental equal of a god. The late Frankenpope recently released a document based upon this teaching saying that negroes had infinite dignity! Dignitas Infinita.
As white men, we are constantly opposed by the ravings of Christian madmen, and yet we are meant to also revere Christianity as the religion of the white man and the source of his greatness! If you can square this circle and can run a website upon this squaring, then you have found a source of lucrative employment! A most profitable sinecure indeed!
I think that this idea that Jesus had a reasonable human soul is still “orthodox” Protestant teaching as well.
If reasonable souls exist, then, as you say, negroes are just like whites only with a different paint-job.
With ratiocund—possessing the ability and inclination to reason—souls, we can ignore all of neuroscience and all of anthropology.
But of course, as Richard Carrier points out, if reasonable souls existed, then the human brain would not be the calorie guzzler that it is. For an organ to guzzle calories as greedily as the human brain does is just one of the trade offs of evolution. Some starvation will result from this, but, in the main, humanity will benefit. If reasonable souls existed, then the human brain would not need to guzzle the calories that it does. Fewer people would starve to death, every day, if reasonable souls existed. If reasonable souls existed then damage to the brain would not result in damage to cognitive ability and even alterations in personality!
If everyone possesses an equal reasonable soul, then disparate outcomes must be due to “oppression”. Christian teaching sets the stage for DEI and affirmative action. With affirmative action, we affirm that negroes and women have the same reasonable souls as whites and men. In Christ, there is no male nor female, the New Testament assures us.
I stumbled across the helpful Latin adjectival suffix, ‘-cundus’, yesterday, when reading the Oxford Latin Dictionary.
It’s actually nepotistic Jewish supremacism. Especially with Levine.
Half Child Half Devil is a paraphrase of Rudyard Kipling’s observation of the darkies. These people cannot coexist in our civilization.
She looks like a stereotypical leftie hipster with two children. Yup.
While we don’t need these particular 3D re education camps, we need moar better 2D reeducation camps.
Video Link
You really do flatter to deceive. Perhaps you’ll also state if you believe the current Israeli lies about 40 Jewish babies being beheaded?
You’re all heart, Sam. Where do you stand on ‘altruism’?
Well go to the direct source on this issue.
Why didn’t Churchill, Eisenhower, Charles de Gaulle, and a whole lot more central actors of the disasters of the 1940s come out and say anything either? Why the silence on the part of the top dogs who did not say a word about all the events that make up what was allegedly the greatest massacre in history?
I mean, hell. Fellows like G. Julius Caesar admitted straight up that he slaughtered entire tribes of Germans — which would have been nations today. Was Winston Churchill, etc, ashamed? Or was it like the original warmongers told us: The body counts in Germany’s work camps were just Soviet propaganda. And of course the effects of bombing by the end. Typhus, starvation, the usual effects of total war.
Ron Unz, as a libertarian, would have been very aware of the elder libertarian Murray Rothbard. I saw him speak once; Murray was a great guy. He did not believe anything should go unquestioned or unexamined, including the death tolls of WWII. Despite being Jewish, Rothbard was named as a “denier” in many activist Jewish organizations. He did not care, more to his credit.
No, they’re not. They’re elected by big party donors. If women controlled the Democratic party, it would be dominated by traditional economic populist, old-Left politicians. Beyond basic equal treatment, a social safety net, and protection from domestic violence, women as a group have no interest in the ongoing Leftist cultural pivot, the whole point of which is to distract the public from the men who have destroyed the middle class with wage-busting immigration and off-shoring.
The 2016 election should have put this bullshit to rest. After all, Trump ran on an Old Left platform, and White women voted for him in a landslide 52 to 43 percent. The only White women who voted for Trump was the college-educated set, but even there, Clinton only got 51%, hardly impressive given the relentless New Left higher ed propaganda in the humanities, social sciences, and helping professions departments that women prefer. The education divide will widen as White women educated before the Woke takeover of the Academy die off and are replaced by younger White women voters.
The New Left cultural pivot has accelerated as White women become an ever-smaller proportion of the Democratic coalition, precisely the opposite of what should happen based on your narrative. The anti-Republican backlash post-Roe never materialized. That’s all the manosphere has: one failed prediction after another. Still, you keep it up, because your feelings don’t care about my facts. Worse, you seem determined to push White women into the arms of the Cultural Left that, at best, puts us at the bottom of the totem pole, most recently by continuing to defend gangsters who beat their wives and push deadly drugs that kill our children by the tens of thousands.
That’s right. And the laws and examples he handed down were designed to not only restrain the Hebrews, but to kill those of them that engaged in golden calf fiat Ponzis and other heinous sin. Not coincidentally, this was the same ilk that engaged in human sacrifice and worship of false idols.
In Exodus 32:8, the Lord said to Moses:
And so Moses killed many of them, but (unfortunately) not all.
A faction of these same scum were later flogged by Jesus for money changing in the temple, and ripped to shreds by him for their greed, faithlessness and hypocrisy (Mathew 23).
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=mathew%2023%20&version=DRA
So there is a faction of stiff-necked, hidebound hebroids and their scumbag stooges (the Judas Class) that is not only insatiably greedy, treacherous, and insubordinate beyond belief, but that will take their serpentine, belly-crawling character to Satanic heights.
These “people” are today epitomized by the Marxist-Zionists (“Israel” was founded as a Marxist-Zionist state) and have coalesced into a tightknit, Judeofascist gang over the course of millennia. These are the original “fascists”, and have been at war with authentic Moses-Christian civilization for at least 3,500 years.
In fact, one could argue that these are genuine, primordial ape-men that are incapable of evolving (aka psychopaths).
God knows I believe that. And I also believe that their voodoo-practicing lower order apes are being taught by them to destroy all vestiges of humanity and especially Moses-Christian civilization.
So the question becomes, does Moses-Christianity have not only the right, but the obligation, to protect itself, its civilization, and the human race, by destroying them? And again, the answer is a resounding “YES”. (Of course, the ape-man will never be completely destroyed, only beaten back, like the jungle, but for the world to remain civilized, this must be done again and again and again…).
This is what my religion and civilization says, and this is the Commandment I must preach. I don’t have a choice. There is no freewill involved. I wish there was.
gaedhal: “Yes, the idea that fundamentally equal “reasonable souls” exist.”
The Greeks and Romans had the beginnings of this idea too. Man is the rational animal says Aristotle, and that rational faculty, supposedly unifying all humanity, was why Socrates and Diogenes could proclaim that they were citizens of the world, not just Athens. It’s expressed in Stoicism, but as I noted on a recent thread, the soul for Stoics was material, as was God himself.
I wonder: If the Romans had succeeded in eliminating the Christian infection and the Stoic vision of reality had remained in force, would they have eventually suffered from the hallucination of the equality of souls and disparate impact anyway? It seems there’s something potentially destructive of race and sex in conceptualizing the soul as immaterial, as the Christians do. If it’s immaterial and invisible, you can say anything you want about it and there’s no way to check. You can proclaim the equality of Greek and Jew, male and female, nigger and white and nobody can prove otherwise. By contrast, if the soul is material, it’s likely the “progress” of science would have eventually allowed people to identify the soul with the brain, and take into account DNA differences.
And there are other components to their belief system, too, that make the Christian worldview more toxic. This notion of “reasonable souls” isn’t wholly persuasive coming from a religion that also tells us we must become like little children in order to be saved, and that the wisdom of this world is foolishness to God. Their pretended respect for reason isn’t convincing coming from those who demand you believe that corpses can come back to life, not to mention numerous other preposterous miracles as recounted in the Bible. Then too, as you note, we have Christianity to thank for the ideas of human “rights” and human “dignity”, which barely exist at all in Stoicism. Nonsense upon stilts!
That’s really not correct. I’m not a libertarian, I’ve never been a libertarian, and I’ve never claimed to be a libertarian. I doubt you can find anything I’ve ever written that would give you that impression.
Over the years I’ve certainly been friendly with some libertarians, but I’ve been friendly with lots of people from all sorts of different ideological camps.
The ‘holocaust’ is a fraud, but so is that claim
1: De Gaulle’s diaries are just that. Day-to-day diaries of his activities. They are not a general history of WWII.
2: Eisenhower’s diaries are like De Gaulle’s: a daily record of his activities. He visited Ohrdruf (a Buchenwald sub-camp) and detailed his visit in his diary, remarking that it was a ‘charnel house of torture’.
As I recall it, neither de Gaulle nor Eisenhower mentioned the dropping of atomic bombs on Japan. This doesn’t mean the bombs were never dropped.
3: Churchill’s case is different, as he clearly mentioned elements of the myth in his diaries (‘murder of millions by scientific means’; ‘the greatest crime in the history of mankind’; ‘persecution’ of Greek Jews whom he claims are buying their lives with their wealth; murder of ‘Hungarian Jews’, which he later said was ‘doubtful’; transport of Hungarian Jews on the ‘Kastner train’ to Switzerland, etc.)
Churchill’s ‘diaries’ are more expansive in scope and purpose than the others. They contain some of his daily recordings, but people shouldn’t think he was the ‘sole’ author. Rather, this multi-volume work was compiled, edited, and even part-written by a group of 14 researchers and writers, some of whom were PhD history students. No doubt they all graduated, magna cum laude.
How would you characterize your political views?
I too was discriminated against, and the injustice forever altered my life and income. I wanted to be a policeman, but they said I was too short. That’s why I went into theoretical physics.
The founders assigned the power of the vote to White, male landowners, and that is how it should be today.
I agree – a highly organised entity – and your post offers an explanation for the links between the Ukraine conflict, and the wars on Syria and Gaza.
Do you want reliable electrical power in North Carolina? Then Duke Energy needs to hire employees according to intelligence and skill level. Here, according to Copilot, is the situation today in South Africa:
White, male landowners
Oh great, that’ll be really fucking popular. Why don’t you go ahead and add religious and a BMI qualification while you’re at it. Why stop at pissing off half the White population (that has never done a damned thing to you) when you can piss off two-thirds.
The whole point of that was that only people with skin in the game who are actually net taxpayers should get a say in how those taxes are spent.
Well, I come from a scientific background, so I’d like to think of myself as a non-ideological pragmatic empiricist, but I’m sure many others would disagree.
Over the years I’ve expressed my candid opinion on a huge range of different hot-button issues, so anyone is free to go through those and decide how they would characterize me.
But do keep in mind that the vast majority of the articles I publish focus on trying to reconstruct the factual reality of what happened or will happen, rather than providing value judgments. I think that tends to support my own characterization.
True to form for White men, you’re always thinking about your wallet.
I have six children. Isn’t that “skin in the game”? What about a man who works hard and supports his family but doesn’t earn enough to owe substantial taxes? This is in fact the very demographic most hated and feared by the neo liberal establishment, because their lives have been destroyed by globalist policies. They are the natural guardians of the strength and sovereignty of the nation-state.
And you are true to form for a gold digging woman. Me me me me me.
There, now we’ve both insulted each other and where are we?
When this country was founded, there was only one demographic that paid taxes aside from excise and import duties; landowners. Why should people who don’t contribute get a say in how things are spent? You have six kids, have you ever read any of them the ant and the grasshopper, or the story of the little red hen?
Everyone has their hands out for a piece of the pie they didn’t help create or work to build.
You have called the American far right a bankrupt movement. Now, after Donald Trump having been re-elected and having deported thousands, would you say you were wrong?
Exquisite question-begging.
You make good common sense points.
“is that no matter how much you bend over backwards for them, blacks, AS A WHOLE, will never, ever catch up”
They will eventually catch up in about 10,000 years of genetic selection.
A good example of black incompetence is that of ESKOM, South Africa’s electricity provider. Once, a world-renowned and recognized top performing electrical utility, it has been relegated to third-world status because the competent white engineers and technicians have been replaced with substandard blacks who could not run a shoe shine stand, let alone a major utility.
Affirmative action, known as BEE (Black Economic Empowerment) has been used to push out competent white engineers and technicians in favor of incompetent blacks. Sound familiar? South African utility customers are lucky if they have electrical power for 4 hours per day. In white areas, generators are commonly used to maintain electrical power when the utility goes down.
Another good example of black incompetence is that of land redistribution which stole land from productive white farmers and awarded fully functioning farms to blacks. The first thing these blacks did was to dismantle and sell the farm machinery for scrap, were unable to plant and harvest anything, and in general ruined perfectly good crop-producing farms.
A small number of South African blacks realize that they screwed up, big time, and would like to have the whites back in power. They may get their wish, but not in the way that they desire. Chinese interests have been looking at and buying up South African resources as business interests. The Chinese will not treat blacks as well as the whites who preceded them.
Couldn’t happen to a better bunch of (stupid black) people.
If I were required to “teach” the jewish “holocaust” fable, I would do so from an engineering standpoint.
Teaching this (non) event from an engineering perspective would provide proof that the claims made by so-called jewish “holocaust” survivors are based on outright falsehoods and assumptions, quite often second and third-person claims, that at least should be taken with a grain of salt. Every so-called holocaust claim is BS.
1. The claim that cremation took only a few minutes is totally false. Cremation takes over an hour for just one body. It is impossible to refute the laws of physics to speed up the process.
2. The claim that thousands of bodies were gassed or cremated every day is totally false. See #1.
3. The claim that crematorium facilities required little or no maintenance is false. Downtime is required to remove ashes and to maintain the muffles.
4. The claim that “jewish bodies smoke smells different than gentile smoke is false. Jewish lack of good hygiene practices is suspect.
5. The claim that Zyklon B was used as a gas chamber agent is false. Zyklon B requires elevated temperatures to become effective.
6. The claim that gassed bodies were of a blue or purple color is false. Gassed bodies are red due to oxygen depletion.
7. The claim that gas chambers without gas-tight doors (that swing the wrong way) and the lack of ventilation means is false. There is a chimney at Auschwitz that is not connected to anything.
8. The claim that “gassed bodies” were handled without decontamination procedures being followed is false. Lack of decontamination would have killed the operators. Decontamination takes hours to achieve.
9. The claim that “6 million” jews were exterminated is false. Actual figures are approximately 271,000 from all perils. More Roman Catholics than jews perished in the labor camps.
10. The claim that Germany used scarce resources to transport people it intended to exterminate is false. Germany was energy poor. Utilizing scarce resources to transport inmates only to kill them is preposterous.
There are many more examples of outlandish holohoax falsehoods that can be easily debunked from a scientific and engineering standpoint.
P. S.: Let’s not forget lampshades, soap, shrunken heads and light switch handles made from jews…lol
No, they were obsessed with helping it. Most of our spy apparatus was infiltrated by communists and sympathizers seeking to help it. McCarthy and the Cambridge 5 were just the tips of the icebergs.
And communism has always been the philosophy of the 1%. It is a top-down apparatus. Jews and WASPs love it.
Defeating the petty bourgeoisie in America—largely ethnics—was something the commies had to do to take over. Unlike with Russia, which had a top-down apparatus that commies seized, in America the power was more diffuse, and thus a take over would require defeating those factions by sabotage.
Viewed from another angle, it was the policy of pro-communist intelligence agencies to enact Communism via Fabianism in the west via slowly pushing them left, like installing further and further left-wing governments.
Trump and his jewish zionist cabinet are playing you like a fiddle. How can anybody be here and yet still be sleeping so deeply?
Merit matters only inside homogeneous culture.
NW European Protestant men ( “. . us, and our posterity”). There is no valid institution without such men both in charge and populating its ranks.
LCS (Lie, Cheat, Steal) begins as one leaves that small circle.
Women can’t meet the mark, same as for any increase in geographical distance of ancestry as particulars differing don’t change the fundamental problem.
The rot at the root (legalism) is a lie.
.
“is that no matter how much you bend over backwards for them, blacks, AS A WHOLE, will never, ever catch up”
Which ironically means ‘that blacks will never catch up to the ones‘ who actually, (with amazingly high IQs), are currently destroying the entire planet</b/, continually come up with newer ways to do so faster!
– ‘ How Did We Get These Vicious Laws? – Anti-white thinking goes back longer than you may think.’ –
Too many selfish ignorants sitting centuries, breeding, as ‘he-brews’ s-he-brews’, concocted bogus words, ‘god’ ‘jesus’ ‘religion’, paper ‘l-aw’, ‘government’, ‘state, ‘constitution’ , ‘jews’ distraction, filth distraction, feminizing ignorants, and, scrawling themselves as ‘judges’ or ‘lawyers’ or ‘representative’ – and, claiming ‘immunity’ for themselves, as they commit total crime to destroy others, everyone, and earth.
Ignoring is agreement to other’s control, whether white targeting or other destruction the psycho cabal cons do. Notice ‘sixth amendment’, word ‘impartial’ – im- partial, instead of word – neutral or non-partial, notice most words beginning with ‘in’ are ‘taught’ to be used opposite what should be, also ‘im-possible’, to then concoct their bs ‘impartial’ word. The word ‘just-ice’ means what, just-ice. Not neutral opinion serviice or similar other that could be used. The word ‘judge’, also a con. Who writes ‘judge rules’, they do. ‘lawyers’ and ‘bars’. Their cabal con ‘schools’/skools exist to pound in the cons bogus words, to then use, as selfish dopes ignore what’s in face, claiming to be ‘educated’. The word ‘anarchy’, also a con. No such thing. Were cavemen or vikings ‘anarchist’.
Ignoring threat, leads to more threat. Natural law.
The word ‘rights’ is useless outside the phrase natural rights, meaning able use of force, to defend self or tribe or property or territory. The cons ‘military’ and ‘sheriffs’ and other ‘police’ were made to oppress full self-defense, as the court cons free felons, and attack good resister people.
Who stops people from stopping in-migration, at the airports. Importing half of india, now swarming mass africans.
Who oppresses retaliating crime, full force, the way we decide, the only real judge of being robbed or attacked or threatened. ‘civilization’ is a cabal fraud.
That ‘state’ cons hide their addresses, same time ram cameras every intersection, as others spy every fone etc, as people ‘register guns’, ‘under’ cons with drones, the question how got vicious laws is obvious, ignorant femy juveniles let it go on, and on and on.
Fail to be serious.
Double Firsts would be the applicable term.
Although, Churchill’s works were often his own, they were just edited down by government censors.
I can’t find the article, but it was linked to here at UR several times some years ago.
I always try to go with the experts in slander, spin and cognitive distortions from their own negativity bias. You may possibly be a ” libertarian” , no matter how intelligently you argue your opinion in this democracy. I’ll still be a fan, though now with definitely more doubt, considering it a necessity to accept the facts of the other, or something.
Sorry, just trying to be funny… . Be who you are, it seems to be working quite well.
Compelling state interest is just another way of saying social engineering by unelected dictators in black robes. Who told them they could do that?
Sin City Milla: “Compelling state interest is just another way of saying social engineering by unelected dictators in black robes. Who told them they could do that? ”
I suppose you could say that we did, in setting up a Constitutional form of government. It seems to me it could be justified under the general welfare clause, although if you want specifics on how they actually justified it, you’ll have to do your own research. I’m not sufficiently interested in the question to do it for you. Certainly the state has interests. How it chooses to enforce them is less important than the fact of their existence, and the fact that everyone concedes that the state’s interests can sometimes outweigh the individual (or “natural”) rights of its citizens. I think its uncontroversial that the purpose of government in a technological society is conceded to be the promotion of an orderly environment in which all may “prosper”. Whether forcing integration of society by race and sex is a way of getting there or not is for the technocrats to decide.
Jeremy Bentham, the philosopher of utilitarianism, argued persuasively against the idea that there are such things as “natural rights”. His essay is titled Anarchical Fallacies, and you might want to check it out. He considers natural rights absurd; “nonsense upon stilts”. For Bentham, only society as a whole has rights, not individuals, who only have the rights that society grants them. Society should seek “the greatest happiness for the greatest number”.
Modern technological society is inexorably moving away from the idea of natural rights of individuals — the idea upon which the USA was founded — and toward this utilitarian conception. Discrete human races and sexes are natural, but the technological system generally seeks to replace anything natural with an artificial construct of its own, and so it encourages racial mongrelization and sexual confusion.
Liberia was a consequence of the American Colonization Society…the group which wanted to return the slaves to Africa. Unfortunately, no immediate profit was gained in this venture, so this being America, well, that just wasn’t going to fly.
Oh yeah, he’s a real legend alright. Legendary for naming symptoms while ignoring causes.
“ The creator kept us apart for a good reason “ indeed, thx for speaking truth.