THINGS WHITE PEOPLE CAN’T HAVE BECAUSE IT’S RACIST
Video Link
Once, there was the Reformation. Now, there is the Deformation.
Reformation was violent and bloody but about God and virtue. The Deformation, in contrast, is vile and rotten to the core. It’s about idolatry of the Negro, the most savage race, because he be good at basketball, rapping, and bumping-n-grinding. It’s about celebration of globo-homo-mania and tranny lunacy. It is about mandatory submission to Jews as the new master race and god-folks.
The Reformation was centered on a belief in Power and Truth above the foibles of man. The current Deformation says the holy three of Negroes, homos, and Jews possess(indeed monopolize) the highest authority, and all of humanity must kneel, bow, and grovel before them. What about blacks committing the most crime and destroying communities across the West? Never mind, just chant ‘black lives matter’, kneel down, and get with the program. What about Jews in supremacist mode spreading wars, wrecking entire nations , looting entire economies, and spreading the culture of degeneracy? Never mind, just suck up to Jews as the eternal holy holocaust people and obey… or else you’re an ‘Anti-Semite’. What about Homos being obsessed with vanity & narcissism and indulging in fecal-penetration and spreading disease while trannies are messed up in the head and go for penis-cutting in exchange for fake vaginas? Never mind, just celebrate everything they do, and take your children to drag-queen story hours… or else you are a ‘homophobe’ or ‘trannyphobe’. And being a porny slut with tattoos and piercings(and green hair) is the new ’empowerment’ for women.
An entire generation has been raised on demented violent video games, Tarantino gore-fests of sadism & nihilism(despite the recent partial redemption with ONCE UPON A TIME… IN HOLLYWOOD), retarded rap music, easily accessible porn even for kiddies & dick/vagina pic-‘sexting’ on smartphones, endless homo propaganda as the New Normal, vilification of whiteness as the new devil, ugly MMA filled with deranged lunatics with tattoos(made worse by female MMA slug-fests), erasure of heritage, and ends-justify-the-means nihilism(made worse by having ends that can never be met). In the case of Emma Sulkowicz, acting porny was the new puritanism. She actually made a docu-porn to as a ‘moral’ statement. And how fitting in our Deformed Age that George Floyd the junkie porn actor has been canonized as a black moses-christ? But then, how surreal that the sleazebag opportunist Donald Trump was heralded by so many as a nationalist savior. It’s like we’re living in a cartoon world.
The so-called new ‘left’ is about Negro Worship and Globo-Homo-mania or Queertianity financed by super-rich capitalist Jews. Why are Negroes and Homos favored over the rest(except for Jews)? They had some of the biggest successes under capitalism. Blacks in sports and music, and homos in fashion and design. Classic Leftism, for all its problems, was humanist in valuing all lives. The new so-called ‘left’ feigns commitment to justice, but its distorted and deformed notion of Truth rests on idolatrous capital valuation. Since Negros have value in sports/pop and homos have value in fashion/fanfare/pageantry, they matter more than other groups. Palestinians, like ‘white trash’ or ‘deplorables’, mean nothing because they have little capital value. That is the new ‘leftism’. It’s no wonder that the proglodyte mobs don’t denounce Apple or Google. Or call out California agro-business for exploiting brown labor. As long as Big Capital waves the Noble Negro and Holy Homo banners, they have ‘god on their side’.
Personally, I prefer Protestantism for conscience and Catholicism for culture. While the puritanical streak in Protestantism can be annoying(even exasperating), the Protestant model is closer to true conscientiousness because it’s about individual agency and accountability in relation to God and Truth. Instead of relying on bureaucratic middleman and rigid dogma, you need to find within yourself the courage and will to be at peace with God and Truth, i.e. one must be one’s own priest.
But culturally, the Protestantist outlook has been destructive toward what is deemed false or idolatrous. Pursuant of purity, it leaves little tolerance for whatever’s branded as wicked or deviant. It can lead to cultural drabness.
Today, the New Puritanism is in service to utter puerility. It is a kind of ‘pueritanism’. Infantile idolatry of the trashy and trivial is given the highest ‘spiritual’ perch in our Deformist age. With Hollywood as the new vatican, is it any surprise that pop culture tropes and celebrity cult have become objects of cult worship among the masses? And now with ‘forever young’ boomers as the elders, we have ‘immaturism’ spanning from the old to the young.
At the cultural level, the Catholicist mindset is preferable in both the spiritual and metaphorical senses. Catholicism arrived at a compromise between the glories of paganism and the New Faith. It came to appreciate and preserve tradition in the arts and cultural expression even if such didn’t conform to the spiritual core of the dominant Faith. Thus, it was multi-iconographic than iconoclastic in search of purity.
Martin Scorsese, in his two deeply personal documentaries about cinema — the American and the Italian — exhibited a Catholicist perspective on film history. It allowed for criticality infused with empathy and reverence. For example, certain past works may now seem ‘racist’ or were made under the Fascist regime, but they too are part of film history and should be preserved and appraised beyond fashionable ideological strictures. If certain narratives were overlooked or repressed in the past, the proper way is to open up new narratives than prohibit or destroy old ones.
If puritanism takes hold of culture, there’s no telling how far the iconoclasm will go, a kind of cultural prohibitionism. Puritanism can also spiral into a purist madness in a search-and-destroy mission against microaggressions after macro-aggressors have been banished. Iconoclasm can go into germ-freak mode.
PC and its rabid variant ‘wokeness’ are oddly quasi-fascist. Despite the denunciation of fascism as a kind of pornography of power in its rejection of liberal ideals, PC sees everything in terms of Power and No Power. It is less interested in right and wrong than Power vs No Power. If your side has no power, then empowerment BY ANY MEANS is justified.
It’s no wonder Jews, homos, and blacks, along with feminists, wallow in nihilism. Jews no longer care about ideology. All that matters is More Jewish Power by any means available. Feminism used to side with socialists, but they now celebrate any woman who reaches the top, even if she serves US imperialism or predatory capitalism. Blacks just want blacks to be on top regardless of the ideology or the agenda. So, it didn’t matter that Obama destroyed entire nations. He be a black dude who be calling the shots, sheeeeeiiit. Or consider the feminist praise of the vile movie THE LAST SEDUCTION. The femme fatale character is just awful and preys on innocent victims, but hey, it’s FEMALE empowerment.
In a way, the ‘anti-fascists’ really envied fascism for its presumed ‘pornographics of power’ because it meant anything was possible without moral restraint. It’s no wonder Friedrich Nietzsche and Michel Foucault became such neo-leftist icons in the postwar period. Traditional leftism meant power must be subordinate to a set of ideals and principles. Thus, there were brakes on demands for empowerment. Attainment of power had to be justified on ideological grounds.
But once identity politics and power-for-power’s sake came to define the new politics, all that mattered was More Power for Myself or My People by any means necessary and for whatever ends. Jewish Supremacists especially set the template for this as the Jewish Left and Jewish Right converged on More Jewish Power. Notice how Bernie Sanders eventually turned out to be a Jewish Supremacist First and socialist second as he willfully took a dive and dissuaded his supporters from forming a true leftist movement against the System controlled by Jewish supremacists.
Now, morality, in seeking what is true, cannot hold too many conflicting values at once. If you’re opposed to slavery, your morality cannot say “slavery is not okay here, but it’s okay over there.” You’re compelled to oppose slavery as a principle. However, culture isn’t only about morality. It’s a remembrance of the past, the realization and understanding that ideas, values, and attitudes have changed over time, that we mustn’t expect other times and other cultures to think and feel just as we do in the righteous moment.
Thus, our cultural(and historical) sense has to be more tolerant and empathetic than the moral sense, which by its nature can’t be overly tolerant. Ideally, one should be morally righteous but culturally broad in the appreciation of the arts and culture. Surely, even an atheist should be able to appreciate Angkor Wat, Temples of India, Mosques of Arabia, and Cathedrals of Europe. Likewise, even an ‘anti-racist’ should see merit in THE BIRTH OF A NATION, even an anti-communist should see value in BATTLESHIP POTEMKIN, even sympathizers of the American Indians should recognize the American Western as a popular art form, and even a Jew should acknowledge the genius of Richard Wagner and Leni Riefenstahl. And even an anti-Jewish person should see value in Gustav Mahler, Mendelssohn, and Mel Brooks.
The current Deformation is the worst of all worlds. Not only does the Rage of the Moment dictate puritanism with destructive consequences but the supposed morality is really an immorality. The truth sought in the Reformation was about God and Holiness. One could disagree with the interpretations and arguments of the opposing side, but at the core it was about a genuine search for and defense of sanctity as they understood it. At the very least, they knew better than to worship the cult of man and things. Even Catholics accused by Protestants for idolatry understood that God, Jesus, and Truth were infinitely higher than anything made of stone by human hands.
In contrast, the Deformation cannot conceive of anything higher than George Floyd as Magic Negro. Or consider the cult of Michael Jackson upon his passing. You’d think it was the death of god hisself. Deformation cannot conceive of anything holier than drag queens and homos prancing around while hogging the word ‘pride’. Deformation cannot think of a higher loyalty than ‘Muh Israel’ and ‘We stand with Israel(as it sucks out the life of remaining Palestinian communities in West Bank).
The Deformation isn’t merely about the tolerance of vices, such as gambling, but the promotion of vice as the new virtue, e.g. “Look, gambling is morally justified because it provides reparations for Indians, thus washing away America’s sins!” (How about a casino at Auschwitz?) The Desert Inn Has Heart, the Desert Inn Has Heart. Las Vegas, the Christmas Place To Be! Homosexual vanity isn’t merely tolerated and contained within the ‘gay’ community but is ‘spiritualized’ into the new iconography for the churches.
We’ve been fed this narrative about linear human progress, but spiritually and morally, are people in the West better off in the 21st century than during the Reformation? Is it ‘more progress’ to worship Mammon, Magic Negroes, Tooty Homos, and Insane Jewish Supremacists? We were told that mankind evolved from religion and superstition to reason and sense. But, where is the rationality in elevating the criminal Negro upon the pedestal? What is the sense of supporting Zionist lunatics in their maniacal schemes? Where is the science in saying a man with penis & balls and wig on his head is really a ‘woman’? This sounds more like the Age of Endarkenment than Enlightenment.
If this keeps up, even Scorsese’s two magisterial documentaries will have to be scrapped in the spirit of ‘canceling’ bad culture because too many of the works discussed could be associated with this-ism, that-ism, or whatever-ism. For the longest time, the Left made kids read Arthur Miller’s CRUCIBLE as a warning against authoritarianism, ideological puritanism, and the culture of paranoia. But the warning has now become the blueprint for Jewish Power. The same happened with Franz Kafka’s THE TRIAL and THE CASTLE. Given the labyrinthine games of Jewish Power that twist logic and bend every rule, we find ourselves like Kafka’s fictional alter egos. We must deal with situations where the goal posts are constantly moved. We’re like the anti-hero of COOL HAND LUKE who is made to dig and dig, always ‘wrong’ even when made to follow orders.
But then, there was something disingenuous about Jews like Arthur Miller. He attacked the political puritanism of the American Right in defense of communists and Jewish radicals whose ideological intolerance and purge-culture were far more extreme. It turns out Jews resisted repression not for freedom for all but for power to repress goyim.
NASCAR BUBBA’S HOAX
Video Link
I hope to see this topic explored in its own essay.
The West has become too decadent to keep the Muslim “refugees” out. I am almost losing hope for the future.
Impressive article, JF. I’ll need to read it again, and the subject of the Romish hegemon vs Wycliffe, Huss, Luther, Calvin… won’t be settled soon.
But I’m a little bit in disagreement with your disparaging picture of the Sub-Saharan Africans. E.g. impressed that the South-Sudanese make us look like dwarfs, slow ones.
Check out Catholic Social Doctrine. It’s one of the best things they ever came up with, given their history. Sadly, it remains just doctrine to this day.
Don’t give that clergyman too much grief over his “polite email” about evil.
Video Link
Bill Burroughs had their number:
Esteemed J-F,
“Man takes a drink, drink takes a drink, drink takes a man.”
A.A. aphorism.
Credit is more addictive than alcohol or opiates. “I did not know debt had undone so many.” As for European culture, Ezra Pound has preceded you down this road. I refer you to “With Usura” from The Cantos. And why is Latin America the way it is? The Judeo-Masonic Clerisy would have us believe it’s because of Catholicism. Not quite. I suggest Eduardo Galeano’s masterful “Open Veins of Latin America.”
I suggest the current state of affairs in the area formerly known as the “Free World” represents end stage Capitalism. Eventually usury devours everything that is “good, beautiful and true.” It’s nothing personal, it’s just what it does. My hunch is Rev. Malthus, in a classic maneuver of “bait & switch,” projected the properties of compound interest on population growth. (The Anglo-Zionist always punches down). Nature abhors a vacuum. Well, usury vacuums nature. Hence, the “cavalcade of perversions” paraded in front of the innocent in “the widening gyre.” Unless a debt “jubilee” is declared soon, the specter of people selling their own children online is not far off.
The most important thing is to urge the Chinese to firewall their society from Jewish Capital. The Chinese need to set about erecting another “Great Wall,” a digital wall. Jews congregate in Chinese Restaurants on Christmas Day. The Yid & the Chinaman have formed something of a cultural alliance. It’s incumbent on every man, woman & child to urge the Chairman to defend his people from despoilation.
The Jews beat the Protestants at their own game. The Reformers sprouted up after Gutenberg’s contraption with a completely contractual understanding of reality. The Talmudists made fast work of them. And now the great White Reformers are melting like sweet butter on the asphalt. The sun rises in the east. The point of the Incarnation is human solidarity over tribalism.
Please, for the love of God and all that is sacred, learn to use the word than properly. I won’t read another one of your otherwise thoughtful essays until you do. The title of this article should read, ‘Ours is the Age of Deformation rather than Reformation’ or ‘Ours is the Age of Deformation more than Reformation.’ Perhaps English is not your first language, but if you are going to write pretentious umpteen thousand-word essays and expect people to read them, you must learn to use the word than. I know I can’t be the only one driven crazy by this.
Adding ‘rather’ is pretentious. 1776 was about dropping the ‘rather’.
“Iconoclasm can go into germ-freak mode.”
An author writes a mystery novel in which the murderer is a Jew.
“Boooooh!! He depicts Jews as violent criminals!”
Scared he rewrites his work. Now the victim is a Jew.
“Boooooh!! He enjoys Jews being murdered!”
He rewrites his text again, and now the detective is a Jew.
“Scandal!! In depicting the most powerful character as a Jew, he is hinting at the Sages of Zion, AIPAC, ZOG, Mossad, etc.!”
Almost in panic, he makes some changes again, and now a minor character belongs to the Chosen People.
“Hiss and Booh!! He is discriminating Jews and degrading them to second-class citizens!”
Completely distressed he produces a last version of his book which contains no Jewish character at all.
“Uuaaah!! Now Eliminatory Antisemitism is in full throttle!! He has made Jews completely vanished and invisible!!”