On Feb. 18 and 19, United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres convened a meeting in Doha, Qatar, to discuss the “evolving situation” in Afghanistan and future engagement with the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan. The Taliban declined an invitation to the meeting after the U.N. refused their conditions, including recognizing the Taliban as the legitimate government of Afghanistan.
Guterres reported that the attendees’ “creation of a contact group with a more limited number of states able to have a more coordinated approach in the engagement with the de facto authorities” might include “the P-5 with a group of neighboring countries and a group of relevant donors.” Guterres said he is starting consultations on the appointment of a special envoy “to coordinate engagement between Kabul and the international community.”
The Taliban rejected the need for a special envoy, but Pakistan supported it and specified the envoy must be a “Muslim, experienced diplomat, and from the region.”
Though the West is fixed on the issue of Afghan women and girls, the world needs to engage with the Islamic Emirate on other issues, including water rights, migration, narcotics trafficking and counterterrorism. In many instances, neighbors are already talking directly to the emirate, such as Tashkent’s low-key discussions with Kabul over rights to the water of the Amu Darya, which rises in the Pamir Mountains.
Other countries will also prefer to deal directly with Kabul. China recently appointed a new ambassador to the emirate; Russia will continue its engagement with Kabul; and the Central Asian republics, Iran and Pakistan, as neighboring countries, will not feel the need to use the offices of the envoys, though it will be useful if it can “me-too” their existing positions.
The envoy’s task may be “promoting dialogue between the extremist group and exiled opposition political figures” — that is, the guys the Taliban defeated despite America’s two-decade, $2 trillion sponsorship. In fact, the Taliban and ordinary Afghans are concerned that power sharing will entail the return of the warlords and corrupt officials of the ousted Islamic Republic, according to Obaidullah Baheer of the American University in Afghanistan. If this includes warlords and former Islamic Republic officials, the Taliban’s job will be made much easier.
On the issue of women and girls, the Taliban recently approved female high school graduates to enroll in state-run medical institutes for the new academic year beginning in March, showing that change will come at the Taliban’s pace and will be the result of negotiations between the capital, Kabul and Kandahar, the base of the hard-liners.
The acting interior minister, Sirajuddin Haqqani, and Mullah Yaqoob, acting defense minister, recently warned Hibatullah Akhundzada, Afghanistan’s supreme leader, that reforms must be quickly forthcoming or else there would be consequences. The opportunity to split the Taliban between reformers like Haqqani and Yaqoob and hardline leader Akhundzada may be tempting to Washington, but fostering a civil war will damage Central and South Asia and demonstrate conclusively that Washington is humiliated and spiteful, not patient and constructive.
The envoy may find the going easier if he joins hands with the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC). The OIC has an action plan that addresses the participation of women in all areas of public life; in 2023 the organization announced, “The [OIC] Secretary-General also affirmed the OIC’s determination to continue constructive dialogue to empower Afghan women and guarantee their right to access education at all levels and participate in public life.” The OIC participated in the U.N.’s Doha meeting on Afghanistan.
The OIC can address Afghan women’s rights in an Islamic context and may make better progress than Western governments, which the Taliban consider “the guys we defeated.” With the OIC in the lead, it and the U.N. may be able to convince the Taliban hardliners that women’s rights and education is an Islamic virtue by highlighting women’s contributions to the growing economies of Indonesia and Malaysia, but without taking sides in the Kabul-Kandahar tension.
As to the envoy, though Pakistan would like to fill that role, fraying ties between Pakistan and the Taliban may limit his effectiveness. A better candidate would be from Central Asia, which has diplomats experienced in dealing with the Taliban, or Turkey, the only NATO member with a diplomatic presence in Kabul.
Uzbekistan has strongly supported the Trans-Afghan railway and recently secured Qatar’s financial support for the project. In 2018, Tashkent publicly encouraged the Taliban to start peace negotiations with the Afghan government, and it recently offered technical assistance to the emirate’s Qosh Tepe Canal and warned the Taliban of the potential for leaks. (The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation found that each dollar spent on canal maintenance saves ten to twelve dollars of water.) And the Uzbeks were right: in December 2023, the canal walls apparently failed and spilled enough water to form a nine-kilometer lake in the desert.
Turkey never cut off relations with Afghanistan, and has increased engagement since August 2021. Ankara has hosted visits by senior Taliban officials and provided emergency aid to the emirate; it also encouraged an inclusive government in Kabul, and education for girls. In 2022, Turkey completed the second phase of the Kajaki dam hydropower project. Ankara has also maintained trade links with the emirate (2022 exports were just under $270 million.)
The envoy will have to fight to get on the Taliban foreign minister’s calendar. Seventeen countries maintain embassies in Kabul, the latest being Azerbaijan, which officially opened its embassy on Feb. 15. And, on Jan. 29, the emirate convened a conference in Kabul attended by representatives of 11 countries, including Russia, India, China, Pakistan, Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan. The conference underlined the fact that, while the U.S. and Europe are staying away, Afghanistan’s neighbors are pragmatically seeking to engage the emirate.
Successful engagement with the Islamic Emirate will be a group effort and, if the U.N. envoy materializes, a sure path to success may be via a partnership with the OIC.
James Durso (@james_durso) is a regular commentator on foreign policy and national security matters. He served in the U.S. Navy for 20 years and has worked in Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and Iraq.
Tajikistan’s Taliban.
What was the point of this article? As Durso writes at the end:
The envoy will have to fight to get on the Taliban foreign minister’s calendar. Seventeen countries maintain embassies in Kabul, the latest being Azerbaijan, which officially opened its embassy on Feb. 15. And, on Jan. 29, the emirate convened a conference in Kabul attended by representatives of 11 countries, including Russia, India, China, Pakistan, Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan. The conference underlined the fact that, while the U.S. and Europe are staying away, Afghanistan’s neighbors are pragmatically seeking to engage the emirate.
Taliban Afghanistan is a matter for countries in the region to deal with. They are doing so. America, and the West generally, have no interests, vital or otherwise, in the place. Let the states in the region deal with it and stop the pontificating about women’s rights, After all, they seem to be better treated than the lives of Palestinians in Gaza, about whom Western Governments try not to mention.
Why should anyone talk to the Taliban? let them stew in their own piss until some other group in Afghanistan gets tired of them and attacks them.
If a less dangerous version of Fentanyl cannot be produced, this could force them to have to return to Afghanistan again for opioids.
“Who Will Talk to Afghanistan’s Taliban?”
Anyone who sees them as no better than themselves, I suppose.
{the latest being Azerbaijan, which officially opened its embassy on Feb. 15}
There is NO such a country as ‘Azerbaijan’. There is only ONE Azerbaijan where is a PROVINCE of Iran, in the northern part of the country. Iranians call it FAKE republic of Baku. Baku is a piece of the Iranian Azerbaijan province where was STOLEN by Russia in the 19th century. Russia deliberately call BAKU as ‘Azerbaijan’ hoping to steal the rest of the province sometimes in the future. After the demise of the Soviet Union, Aliyev, the father of Elham Aliyev, announced ‘independence’.
Elham Aliyev, the son, is a corrupt dictator who has stolen billion of dollars from Baku oil revenue, buying many pieces of REAL ESTATE in Britain, that’s why the criminal west support such a thief because he brings the stolen money to UK. Aliyev is a zionist dictator in the service of the genocidal Jews who is shipping oil from Baku to Israel through Turkey to help the GENOCIDE in GAZA, yet the charlatan Eudogan claims is supporting Palestinians. Both are zionist liars in the service of the evil empire and Zionism.
Aliyev has turned Baku into a zionist military base, spying on Iran for Israel and sending Mossad trained terrorists to Iran through the shared border killing the Iranian worshipers in the Masque. Number of these Mossad trained terrorists have been arrested and few of them are executed.
We should leave the Taliban alone. Avoid. Avoid. Avoid.
The Chinese will, maybe the Russians too.
Give it a few months, they’ll be applying to join BRICS.
The enemy of my enemy, and such.
It is worth remembering Afghanistan was on the verge of becoming
a modern country and the Usual Suspects didn´t like it, so what are they
complaining about?
Indeed. To see photos of Kabul in the 1970s compared to today is almost incomprehensible. Al Qaeda and Taliban were birthed in Langley and Islamabad. A similar story next door in Iran. How different that country would be today if the CIA and MI6 had not overthrown Mosaddegh.
Good point, but UKUS also ousted Reza Shah (Mohammed Reza´s daddy)
in 1941 for being insufficiently antifa – and then they wonder why all their
toads are corrupt and cannot fight their way out of a wet paper bag.
“What was the point of this article?”
No idea. I guess it was supposed to serve as some tour de force of the author’s supposed worldliness, but I have no idea what the point was, the communication of which is and should be the main focus of a writer after all.