The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Edward Dutton Archive
The UK Cabinet Minister Who Knows, Deep Down, She’s a Prominent Example of Those Responsible for the Pakistani Grooming Gangs
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
List of Bookmarks
The Morally Superior, Self-Righteous, Neurotic, Narcissistic, Virtue-Signaller, in All-Ways-Perfect. Lucy Powell
The Morally Superior, Self-Righteous, Neurotic, Narcissistic, Virtue-Signaller, in All-Ways-Perfect. Lucy Powell

Why would a relatively senior Labour Cabinet Minister – Lucy Powell, the Leader of the House of Commons – refer to one of the , worst scandals in British history, an effective war crime against the British people by foreign invaders, as blowing “that little trumpet” and as a “dog whistle”? Even in the heat of radio discussion program in which Powell was being out-debated, what can be the psychology behind such a grossly insensitive remark, especially from the party that is supposed to care about people’s “feelings” above all else?

Between 1998 and 2010 alone, many thousands of underage English girls, most of part of the underclass and from vulnerable backgrounds were “groomed” and trafficked into prostitution – into statutory rape – by Pakistani males in ex-Industrial towns. The grooming involved the men bonding with these girls, and getting them addicted to alcohol and drugs such as heroin, and pimping round the Pakistani community. One of these girls were as young as 9, many were younger than 12 and the age-group which the clients specifically preferred was between 12 and 14; in other words pubescent rather than fully sexually mature.

Many of these girls were extremely vulnerable; in foster care or children’s homes due to their dysfunctional backgrounds. In fact, the Pakistanis were even able to pick them up from their children’s homes in some cases, or even from their schools. One 11-year-old girl lost her virginity to a Pakistani man on a school playground. Concerns were first raised about what was going on about the year 2000, but, we know now, these were suppressed by the police, social workers and local politicians because it was feared that race relations would be damaged, and their might even be riots, if what was happening got out. People also fear speaking out in case they were accused of racism. Thus, it was allowed to continue right up until 2010, when men were finally brought to trial and there began to be reports into what had been happening. The horrors went beyond mere frequent statutory rape. A 12 year old girl in Oxford was beaten with a baseball bat which was then inserted into her vagina. Her anus was widened using a pump, such that penises could more easily fit into it, and her lead abuser, Mohammed Karrar, branded his initials close to her anus using a red hot pin.

Karrar was jailed into 2013. However, what happened was so horrific, and on such an enormous scale, it is as though the English simply couldn’t face it. Even in spite of the local inquiries, it only began to really be spoken of when Elon Musk started tweeting about it at the beginning of this year, and, even then, the Prime Minister, Keir Starmer, referred to the fevered response as a “far right band wagon.”

With Lucy Powell, however, the mask that the Left in the UK actually care about vulnerable English people, let alone these thousands of rape victims, has finally come off, due to her momentary emotional reaction. As I discuss in my book Woke Eugenics, a number of studies have shown that the Left are extremely Machiavellian. They only ever favoured their native working class because they were out-group which they could employ to covertly attain power via virtue-signalling. But now you can engage in virtue-signalling more conspicuously about foreigners, as they are even more distant from self so easier to Romanticise, the horribly White working class are an inconvenience to their high Neuroticism, a barrier to their resentment-triggered desire to tear traditions down and signal their morality. Lucy Powell’s reaction makes perfect sense in this light.

We have trouble talking about what happened in the UK. We have trouble articulating it because what’s happened is so bad, so appalling. Over the last 50 or 60 years, Pakistanis have come among the British and have acted in a covert manner, like an invading force. What you do when you are an invading force, as did the Russians, and even to some extent the Americans when they invaded Germany, is you go and you rape the women.

Why do you do that? You do it in order to mark yourself genetically, on the people. You do it in order to humiliate the males. You do it in order to destroy their morale. And that is what these men were doing, and they were doing it for a period of least 20 years and, according to some reports, for a lot longer. It was covered up by the Labour-run authorities because it highlighted a problem with multiculturalism and no problem with that could be highlighted because of course, multiculturalism had become the new morality—sacrosanct and above reproach. It triggers the moral posturing that justifies the power of the New Labour ruling class—of people such as Powell who, high in Narcissism, need to see themselves as special and as morally superior.

But Lucy Powell was on the ropes. The grooming gang scandal showed her that she was at best gulled into a terrible ideology and at worse morally complicit in rape for promoting that ideology, something she’d done because her own mental instability; her own flaws. Her comments reflected a series of psychological mechanisms via which she could maintain her image of her perfect, morally superior self.

There simply can’t be problems due to her policies. So she deflects by having a go at the person interviewing her, by shooting the messenger, by saying that by bringing up grooming gangs, he’s causing a lack of social cohesion. So she refers to his mentioning the grooming gangs about as a “little trumpet” and a “dog whistle;” presumably to the non-humans of the “far right” and the “white working class” of whom they are composed. She wants to shut down the topic, to avoid thinking about it; to end the cognitive dissonance.

Obviously, she’s trying to minimize it as well, which is very interesting psychologically. She’s minimizing what is happening, referring to it as a “little trumpet,” a really revolting term. This minimizing allows her to tell herself that even if her policies caused it, it really wasn’t that bad. In this, she was supported by former Guardian editor Michael White who defended Powell in Twitter, proclaiming “Sex is complicated,” the implication being the statuary rape is a grey area: Some of these 13 year-old girls wanted it: Their suffering is minimized and with it so is the cognitive dissonance of Multiculturalist Narcissists who must feel morally superior at all times.

Left-wing people are higher in Neuroticism than people that are right-wing. They are less emotionally controlled, and therefore the truth has come out. Powell is less able to control her emotions because being high in Neuroticism makes you emotionally unstable, but it also means you feel very strongly things like resentment, anger and even cognitive dissonance. So Powell’s contemptuous remarks really do make sense.

One imagines she resents the grooming gang victims; almost blames them for damaging the god of multiculturalism by speaking out. Powell, indeed, is likely to simply be low in empathy. There are a number of studies on how left-wing people are lower in generalized empathy than right-wing people. They are lower in Agreeableness. They are unkind, they are Machiavellian, as noted earlier, and they are perfectly happy to see people as a means to an end.

(Republished from The Occidental Observer by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 16 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Pythas says:

    Time to exterminate these leftist fuckers once and for all. What kind of vile sub-human scum let their own kinswomen in their own country let asiatic sand-nigger paki scum do this?

    • Agree: anonymouseperson
  2. @Pythas

    In the case of the UK, it wasn’t “these leftist fuckers” alone. Enoch Powell was tossed from the Conservative Party for complaining about the number of “asiatic sand-nigger paki scum” (along with Indians and West Indians) being allowed in. They’ve all been in on it, because the merchant class knew it was good for them.

    • Thanks: Pierre de Craon
  3. Wokechoke says:

    “That’s a dog whistle!”

    “Heard by a complete bitch.”

  4. Wokechoke says:
    @Pythas

    This is what happens when you mobilize the entire world to crush nativists on the European continent.

  5. RestiveUs says:
    @Pythas

    Is it possible for you to conclude one post without all those low-brow epithets?

  6. Anonymous[111] • Disclaimer says:

    Lucy Powell is breaking in Redrum’s teeth.

  7. Anonymous[111] • Disclaimer says:

    I remember reading of a similar ‘grooming scandal’ in the Netherlands, this time involving young Dutch girls and Moroccan men.
    Apparently, a tattoo on each girl’s bare buttocks – made to look like an ‘official’ branding stamp saying that ‘This is Abdul’s (etc) Property’ was de rigueur.

  8. So who is responsible for White and black grooming gags, racist hatemonger?

    • Troll: Rosie
  9. Left-wing people are higher in Neuroticism than people that are right-wing. … Powell is less able to control her emotions because being high in Neuroticism makes you emotionally unstable, but it also means you feel very strongly things like resentment, anger and even cognitive dissonance. … [She] is likely to simply be low in empathy. There are a number of studies on how left-wing people are lower in generalized empathy than right-wing people. They are lower in Agreeableness. They are unkind, they are Machiavellian, as noted earlier, and they are perfectly happy to see people as a means to an end.

    Although I am very largely in agreement with the quoted remarks, it strikes me that almost everything that Dutton has written for TOO, TUR, and other non-academic White-interest online publications during the past year or two reads like the material above. That is to say, the pejorative characterizations roll far too glibly off his keyboard for this reader’s comfort. It is psychoanalysis-while-u-wait.

    My point is that this is a public forum, one with a certain level of dignity and intellectual respectability. It is not a local pub or a private chat room, where the sorts of capsule diagnoses that might pass muster among likeminded friends and comrades who have thrashed out the topic thoroughly among themselves over the course of months or years might be regarded as appropriate. If the object is to win other White people over to our perspective—and surely that is important to all of us—Dutton at least ought to offer a few links to studies or discussions that contain data or evidence that, as he avers, support his generalizations. As his remarks now stand, someone new to this site might readily be forgiven for considering them little more than a collection of upmarket insults.

    If, as he would have us believe, Dutton is fully committed to the cause of exposing and reversing the (((alien))) takeover of the West, he ought to stop writing like a participant in a comment thread and return to writing like a serious essayist.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  10. Gordo says:

    Thank you Doctor Dutton.

  11. TG says:

    Indeed. But. IMHO the primary reason for mass immigration is greed. It has been shown throughout history, that when a population is forced up at an excessively high rate, that wages and living standards for the many are driven down, and rents and profits for the few are drive up. Which is the entire idea.

    The UK is importing all these muslims for one reason: because for the last few decades, the global supply of desperate impoverished whites is too small to have a significant downwards effect on wages, so you just go with whatever warm bodies are most readily available. Shovel them in, sinner and saint, educated and illiterate, it simply does not matter as long at the numbers are kept up. And anything questioning this policy – which is essentially treating the working class like cattle – must be attacked. Because the policy of open borders is so obviously vile, the only way for the elites to keep a lid on it is to attack the slightest criticism with total overwhelming force. Anything that might discomfit an immigrant invader must be done away with, not because the elites care about the immigrants, but because the floodgates must remain open.

    As Bernie Sanders said back when he was honest, open borders is not ‘left,’ it’s the hard-right policy of people like the Koch brothers.

    Follow the money.

  12. Anonymous[887] • Disclaimer says:
    @Pierre de Craon

    Yes, do all you glowies and hasbara hear this?? Knock it off! Your incendiary and cacophonous comments meant to drown out the signal and alienate others works. So please just stop, post haste!!

  13. anonymous[328] • Disclaimer says:

    Pakistanis are not much of an asset to any country receiving them, not on any level. They’re not very good looking either and this scandal outs some aspects of their culture that most people tend to gloss over. Most marry cousins, a subject not brought up at all. The Western so-called leaders care nothing about the mass of peasants they rule over, being there to service them like animals on a farm are there to service the farmer. Western leadership appears to be composed of degenerates.

    • Replies: @ThreeCranes
  14. @anonymous

    Some people lift weights to make of themselves what they want to see in themselves and how they want to be seen.

    The self-styled or authentic upper-class Englishman strives to perfect his ability to put down another person with a subtle but lethal jibe. Sort of like a revealed check in chess. Move this piece and the opponent is impaled, not on the piece in hand but upon the deadly barb that was hidden but is now disclosed or revealed.

    This subtle sadism is the highest art of being an English gentleman. With their rough-mannered working class the Elite need not even be subtle in pointing out their flaws, need not even engage their full powers—which is why they despise them so. What’s the fun in shotgunning a quarry that won’t even make a run for it? There’s no prestige to be had in owning a hand-tooled Purdy when an ordinary Mossberg will do.

  15. “Buying time.” Apparently, the media has been instructed to cover these horrors up until the time came when it was too late to stop the tragic Islamification of UK, France, Germany, Sweden, etc. At this point this devious, anti-white/Christian, probably Jewish, deep state can breathe a sigh of relief and look at the frog in the pot and say, “What are you going to do about it now? Jump out of the pot? You’re already cooked.”

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Edward Dutton Comments via RSS